Skip to main content

Table 1 Frequencies of Categorical Variables and Sustainability Scores Per Category

From: Influence of participation in a quality improvement collaborative on staff perceptions of organizational sustainability

Variables Survey Responses % (N) Total Sustainability Score Mean (SE)
Time
 Time1 25.1 (n = 585) 71.91 (1.031)
 Time2 27.0 (n = 629) 75.56 (0.992)
 Time3 26.8 (n = 625) 78.43 (0.965)
 Time4 21.0 (n = 490) 78.66 (1.094)
Implementation Strategy*
 Learning session 24.5 (n = 570) 74.03 (1.053)
 Interest circle 21.0 (n = 488) 75.55 (1.159)
 Coaching 26.7 (n = 621) 76.86 (0.963)
 Combination 27.9 (n = 650) 77.53 (0.949)
Job Function
 Clinicians 55.4 (n = 1290) 74.87 (0.782)
 Administrators 44.6 (n = 1039) 78.16 (0.714)
Non-Profit Status
 No 13.4 (n = 312) 72.64 (1.60)
 Yes 86.6 (n = 2017) 76.59 (.054)
Free-Standing Status
 No 46.5 (n = 1083) 74.55 (0.79)
 Yes 53.5 (n = 1246) 77.36 (0.66)
Accreditation
 No 65.3 (n = 1522) 76.46 (0.63)
 Yes 34.7 (n = 807) 75.34 (0.89)
Metropolitan Statistical Area
 Rural 21.4 (n = 498) 77.93 (1.09)
 Urban 78.6 (n = 1831) 75.57 (0.58)
  1. * Within this repeated measure sample, the percent of clinics with included staff responses represented within each implementation strategy were: Interest Circle (89.8%), Coaching (86.0%), Learning Sessions (70.4%), and Combination (89.6%)