Skip to main content

Table 1 Frequencies of Categorical Variables and Sustainability Scores Per Category

From: Influence of participation in a quality improvement collaborative on staff perceptions of organizational sustainability

Variables

Survey Responses % (N)

Total Sustainability Score Mean (SE)

Time

 Time1

25.1 (n = 585)

71.91 (1.031)

 Time2

27.0 (n = 629)

75.56 (0.992)

 Time3

26.8 (n = 625)

78.43 (0.965)

 Time4

21.0 (n = 490)

78.66 (1.094)

Implementation Strategy*

 Learning session

24.5 (n = 570)

74.03 (1.053)

 Interest circle

21.0 (n = 488)

75.55 (1.159)

 Coaching

26.7 (n = 621)

76.86 (0.963)

 Combination

27.9 (n = 650)

77.53 (0.949)

Job Function

 Clinicians

55.4 (n = 1290)

74.87 (0.782)

 Administrators

44.6 (n = 1039)

78.16 (0.714)

Non-Profit Status

 No

13.4 (n = 312)

72.64 (1.60)

 Yes

86.6 (n = 2017)

76.59 (.054)

Free-Standing Status

 No

46.5 (n = 1083)

74.55 (0.79)

 Yes

53.5 (n = 1246)

77.36 (0.66)

Accreditation

 No

65.3 (n = 1522)

76.46 (0.63)

 Yes

34.7 (n = 807)

75.34 (0.89)

Metropolitan Statistical Area

 Rural

21.4 (n = 498)

77.93 (1.09)

 Urban

78.6 (n = 1831)

75.57 (0.58)

  1. * Within this repeated measure sample, the percent of clinics with included staff responses represented within each implementation strategy were: Interest Circle (89.8%), Coaching (86.0%), Learning Sessions (70.4%), and Combination (89.6%)