Skip to main content

Table 1 List and description of quantitative data collection questionnaires

From: The patient advisor, an organizational resource as a lever for an enhanced oncology patient experience (PAROLE-onco): a longitudinal multiple case study protocol

Outcomes

Questionnaires

Dimensions

Number of items

Response scale

Time of measurements

Question numbers in appendices

Patient reported experience

Patient’s care experience questionnaire a

• Site of diagnosed cancer; cancer stage at time of diagnosis; type of treatment; date of start of treatments

• Consultation in oncogenetics, genetic status, time of disclosure of results of genetic testing, surgery to reduce the risk of developing cancer, time of preventive surgery

• Evaluation of information communicated by medical team, support of friends and family.

25 items

Varied

T0

Additional file 4:

T0: 41 to 67

 

Sociodemographic questionnaire a

• Gender, age, country of origin, region, number of people in the household, number of dependents, family composition, level of education, perception of financial situation.

18 items

Varied

T0

Additional file 4:

T0: 22 to 39

 

Patient’s experience with PAs questionnaire a

• Topics discussed, benefits and perceived contribution of PA

• Expectations of patients that did not benefit from PA accompaniment

14 items

Varied

T0, T1, T2

Additional file 4:

T0: 69 to 100

T1: same as T0

T2: 102 to 127

 

Treatment adherence questionnaire [47]

• Intention of receiving treatments

• Obstacles to treatment

8 items

5 point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree and 5 = strongly agree)

T0, T1, T2

Additional file 4:

T0: 148 to 159

T1: same as T0

T2: same as T0

 

CASE [48]

Ability to cope with cancer

• Understand and participate in care

• Maintain positive attitude

• Seek and obtain information

12 items

4 point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree and 4 = strongly agree)

T0, T1, T2

Additional file 4:

T0: 129 to 140

T1: same as T0

T2: same as T0

 

Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K6) [49]

• on emotional states

6 items

5 point Likert scale (1 = Always and 5 = never)

T0, T1, T2

Additional file 4:

T0: 141 to 146

T1: same as T0

T2: same as T0

PA reported experience

PAs’ care experience questionnaire a

• Site of diagnosed cancer; time of diagnostic; type of treatment; date of start of treatments

• Consultation in oncogenetics, genetic status, time of disclosure of results of genetic testing, surgery to reduce the risk of developing cancer, time of preventive surgery

• Evaluation of information communicated by medical team, support of friends and family.

25 items

Varied

T0

Additional file 5:

T0: 39 to 60

 

Sociodemographic questionnairev

• Gender, age, country of origin, region, number of people in the household, number of dependents, household situation, level of education, perception of financial situation.

18 items

Varied

T0

Additional file 5:

T0: 19 to 36

 

Previous personal experience with PAs questionnairea

• Presence of pairing or not with a PA

• Topics discussed, benefits and perceived contribution of PA

• Expectations of patients that did not benefit from PA accompaniment are also evaluated

14 items

Varied

T0

Additional file 5:

T0: 62 to 82

 

Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K6)

[49]

• Psychological distress

6 items

5 point Likert scale (1 = Always and 5 = never)

T0, T2

Additional file 5:

T0: 84 to 89

T2: idem to T0

 

Review of PA experience with patient questionnairea

• Support of clinical team

• Quality of tools used

• Useful information to effectively carry out their role as PA

• Communication with the clinical team

• Role in the clinical team

• Perceived impact of their intervention on the patient and on the PA themself.

140 items

Varied

T2

Additional file 5:

T2: 91 to 241

Descriptive data of each meeting

Logbooka

• PA name

• Patient name

• Date, time, duration

• Context of the request

• People present during the meeting

• Context of the meeting

• Step of patient trajectory

• Topics discussed

• Difficulties and questions

• Feedback from the clinical team

28 items

Varied

After each meeting

Additional file 6:

3 to 42

Health professional reported experience

Adaptation of the Collaborative Practice Assessment Tool (CPAT) [50]

• Perceptions of concepts of collaborative practices, mission and goals of the teams (4 domains out of 8 domains retained and one created for the project)

• General Relationships

• Team leadership

• General role responsibilities, autonomy

• Communication and information exchange

• Practice evaluationa

26 items retained out of 56

7 point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree and 7 = strongly agree)

T0, T2

Additional file 7:

T0: 22 to 47

T2: 103 to 128

 

Group Innovation Inventory [51]

• Innovative culture (adaptation)

7 items retained out of 36

7 point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree and 7 = strongly agree)

T0, T2

Additional file 7:

T0: 48 to 54

T2: 129 to 135

 

Readiness To Partner With Patient and Family Advisers - Patient and FamilyEngagement in the Surgical Environment Module. Content last reviewed May 2017. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality,Rockville, MD. https://www.ahrq.gov/hai/tools/ambulatory-surgery/sections/implementation/training-tools/readiness.htm [50]

• Perception of health professionals concerning the partnership with patients (treatment plan, decision making)

• Perception of health professionals concerning the role of PAs

11 items retained out of 18

5 point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree and 5 = strongly agree)

T0, T2

Additional file 7:

T0: 64 to 74

T2:145 to 155

 

Questionnaire on perception towards the integration of PA in their teama

• Perception of the possibility of integrating PAs into the care team and eventual obstacles

5 items

Varied

T0, T2

Additional file 7:

T0: 56 to 62 et 75

T2: 137 to 143 et 156

 

Readiness To Partner With Patient and Family Advisers - Patient and Family Engagement in the Surgical Environment Module.Content last reviewed May 2017. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. https://www.ahrq.gov/hai/tools/ambulatorysurgery/sections/implementation/training-tools/readiness.htmla

  

Varied

T0

Additional file 7:

T0: 80 to 97

  1. a Questionnaire developed for this study by the research team