Author and publication year | Name of the index | Purpose of the index (for general purpose or health care policy and research) | Types of variables: continuous or categorical | Unit of analysis | How to decide the included factors |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Department of Primary Industries and Energy, Department of Human Services and Health, 1994 [24] | Rural, remote and metropolitan area (RRMA) | for general purpose | categorical | geographical jurisdiction: Statistical Local Area | consensus of a working group |
Weinert et al., 1995 [25] | MSU rurality index | for health care policy and research | continuous | individual | literature review and availability of the data |
Leduc, 1997 [26] | General Practice Rurality Index (GPRI) | for health care policy and research | continuous | health care institution: general practice | literature review |
Department of Health and Aged Care, 2001 [27] | Accessibility/Remoteness Index of Australia (ARIA) | for general purpose | continuous | geographical jurisdiction: populated location | GIS network analysis |
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare Canberra, 2004 [28] | Australian Standard Geographical Classification (ASGC) | for general purpose | continuous | geographical jurisdiction: Statistical Local Area | An enhanced measure of previous remoteness index, ARIA+ |
Swan et al., 2008 [29] | Clinical peripherality indicator | for health care policy and research | continuous | health care institution: general practice | factor analysis |
Kralj, 2008Â [11] | Rurality Index for Ontario (RIO) | for health care policy and research | continuous | geographical jurisdiction: community | principal component analysis, maximum likelihood method |
McGrail et al., 2009 [30] | Index of Rural Access | for health care policy and research | continuous | geographical jurisdiction: collection district | modified two-step floating catchment area method |
Han et al., 2012 [31] | Rural PHCWA index | for health care policy and research | continuous | geographical jurisdiction: county | literature review |
Humphreys et al., 2012 [13] | six-level geographical classification | for health care policy and research | categorical | geographical jurisdiction: city | Geo-coded data and the previous study |
Steinhaeuser et al., 2014 [32] | modified RRS-Germany (mRRS-G) | for health care policy and research | continuous | health care institution: general practice | translation and adaptation of the previous rurality index, RRS |
Mao et al., 2015 [33] | Individual-based rurality and well-being measures | for health care policy and research | continuous | individual | active space approach |
Zhu et al., 2015 [34] | Rural taxonomy | for health care policy and research | categorical | geographical jurisdiction: primary care service area | cluster analysis |
Inagami et al., 2016 [35] | IRR zip | for health care policy and research | continuous | geographical jurisdiction: zip-code level | modification of the previous rurality index, Index of Relative Rurality |
Alasia et al., 2017 [36] | index of remoteness | for general purpose | continuous | geographical jurisdiction: census subdivision | gravity model |
Calovi et al., 2018 [37] | spatial accessibility index | for health care policy and research | continuous | geographical jurisdiction: municipality | two-step floating catchment area method |
Doogan et al., 2018 [38] | Isolation scale | for health care policy and research | continuous | geographical jurisdiction: census tract | literature review |