Skip to main content

Table 2 Description of purpose, types of factors included, and unit of analysis of rurality indices

From: Systematic scoping review of factors and measures of rurality: toward the development of a rurality index for health care research in Japan

Author and publication year

Name of the index

Purpose of the index (for general purpose or health care policy and research)

Types of variables: continuous or categorical

Unit of analysis

How to decide the included factors

Department of Primary Industries and Energy, Department of Human Services and Health, 1994 [24]

Rural, remote and metropolitan area (RRMA)

for general purpose

categorical

geographical jurisdiction: Statistical Local Area

consensus of a working group

Weinert et al., 1995 [25]

MSU rurality index

for health care policy and research

continuous

individual

literature review and availability of the data

Leduc, 1997 [26]

General Practice Rurality Index (GPRI)

for health care policy and research

continuous

health care institution: general practice

literature review

Department of Health and Aged Care, 2001 [27]

Accessibility/Remoteness Index of Australia (ARIA)

for general purpose

continuous

geographical jurisdiction: populated location

GIS network analysis

Australian Institute of Health and Welfare Canberra, 2004 [28]

Australian Standard Geographical Classification (ASGC)

for general purpose

continuous

geographical jurisdiction: Statistical Local Area

An enhanced measure of previous remoteness index, ARIA+

Swan et al., 2008 [29]

Clinical peripherality indicator

for health care policy and research

continuous

health care institution: general practice

factor analysis

Kralj, 2008 [11]

Rurality Index for Ontario (RIO)

for health care policy and research

continuous

geographical jurisdiction: community

principal component analysis, maximum likelihood method

McGrail et al., 2009 [30]

Index of Rural Access

for health care policy and research

continuous

geographical jurisdiction: collection district

modified two-step floating catchment area method

Han et al., 2012 [31]

Rural PHCWA index

for health care policy and research

continuous

geographical jurisdiction: county

literature review

Humphreys et al., 2012 [13]

six-level geographical classification

for health care policy and research

categorical

geographical jurisdiction: city

Geo-coded data and the previous study

Steinhaeuser et al., 2014 [32]

modified RRS-Germany (mRRS-G)

for health care policy and research

continuous

health care institution: general practice

translation and adaptation of the previous rurality index, RRS

Mao et al., 2015 [33]

Individual-based rurality and well-being measures

for health care policy and research

continuous

individual

active space approach

Zhu et al., 2015 [34]

Rural taxonomy

for health care policy and research

categorical

geographical jurisdiction: primary care service area

cluster analysis

Inagami et al., 2016 [35]

IRR zip

for health care policy and research

continuous

geographical jurisdiction: zip-code level

modification of the previous rurality index, Index of Relative Rurality

Alasia et al., 2017 [36]

index of remoteness

for general purpose

continuous

geographical jurisdiction: census subdivision

gravity model

Calovi et al., 2018 [37]

spatial accessibility index

for health care policy and research

continuous

geographical jurisdiction: municipality

two-step floating catchment area method

Doogan et al., 2018 [38]

Isolation scale

for health care policy and research

continuous

geographical jurisdiction: census tract

literature review