Skip to main content

Table 3 Difference-in-Differences analyses of Light Touch vs. Intensive Intervention on PCMC scores. Measured for Full Scale, Change Package, and Non-Change Package items, as well as PCMC Sub-Domainsa

From: A comparison of intensive vs. light-touch quality improvement interventions for maternal health in Uttar Pradesh, India

 

Survey Round: Endline (reference Baseline)

Treatment Group: Light Touch (reference Intensive Intervention)

Interaction term

Full PCMC score, 23 items (unadjusted)

 Coefficient

12.10

−21.60

11.95

 95%CI

(10.76, 13.45)

(−22.95, −20.26)

(10.06, 13.84)

p-value

0.000

0.000

0.000

Full PCMC score, 23 items (adjusted)

 Coefficient

9.16

−23.27

16.15

 95%CI

(7.50, 10.83)

(−25.02, −21.51)

(13.47, 18.83)

p-value

0.000

0.000

0.000

Change Package score, 8 items (adjusted)

 Coefficient

26.94

−25.52

11.75

 95%CI

(24.03, 29.85)

(−28.33, −22.70)

(7.33, 16.17)

p-value

0.000

0.000

0.000

Non-Change Package score, 19 items (adjusted)

 Coefficient

4.54

−23.70

16.79

 95%CI

(2.88, 6.21)

(−25.49, −21.91)

(14.12, 19.45)

p-value

0.000

0.000

0.000

Dignity & Respect (adjusted)

 Coefficient

5.21

−15.07

1.01

 95%CI

(2.26, 8.16)

(−18.05, −12.09)

(−3.84, 5.86)

p-value

0.001

0.000

0.683

Communication and Autonomy (adjusted)

 Coefficient

18.84

−40.90

27.78

 95%CI

(15.77, 21.90)

(−44.01, −37.79)

(22.86, 32.70)

p-value

0.000

0.000

0.000

Supportive Care (adjusted)

 Coefficient

15.53

−12.07

3.29

 95%CI

(13.89, 17.18)

(−13.86, −10.28)

(0.67, 5.92)

p-value

0.000

0.000

0.014

  1. aAdjusted estimates controlled for age, parity, education, wealth, religion, caste, facility type, delivery provider, ANC visits, and pregnancy complications. Robust standard errors were used