Table 4 Model results and fit between outcomes and adjusted and unadjusted models

 Confidence

n of obs. = 206

673

\( {\sigma}_u^2 \) = 0.72

47%

69%

Time

T2 v T1

2.43

2.08–2.79

\( {\sigma}_e^2 \) = 1.03

T3 v T1

2.81

2.42–3.21

ICC = 0.41

T3 v T1

2.75

2.31–3.19

 Knowledge

n of obs. = 127

374

\( {\sigma}_u^2 \) = 0.27

23%

42%

Time

T2 v T1

1.14

0.82–1.46

\( {\sigma}_e^2 \) = 0.83

ICC = 0.24

 Resilience

n of obs. = 144

788

\( {\sigma}_u^2 \) = 15

8%

75%

Time

T3 v T1

2.77

1.82–3.73

\( {\sigma}_e^2 \) = 5.73

T4 v T1

2.54

1.45–3.62

ICC = 0.72

 Confidence adj.

n of obs. = 203

663

\( {\sigma}_u^2 \) = 0.69

48%

69%

Time

T2 v T1

2.41

2.06–2.77

\( {\sigma}_e^2 \) = 1.03

T3 v T1

2.79

2.40–3.19

ICC = 0.40

T4 v T1

2.72

2.27–3.16

Age

–

0.01

−0.01-0.04

Gender

M v F

−0.52

−1.20-0.17

 Knowledge adj.

n of obs. = 124

365

\( {\sigma}_u^2 \) = 0.26

23%

41%

Time

T2 v T1

1.09

0.77–1.41

\( {\sigma}_e^2 \) = 0.81

Age

–

0.01

−0.01-0.03

ICC = 0.24

Gender

M v F

0.00

−0.56-0.55

 Resilience adj.

n of obs. = 142

775

\( {\sigma}_u^2 \) = 14.2

14%

75%

Time

T3 v T1

2.76

1.81–3.71

\( {\sigma}_e^2 \) = 5.71

T4 v T1

2.57

1.49–3.66

ICC = 0.71

Age

–

−0.09

−0.18-0.00

Gender

M vs. F

2.20

−0.60-5.01