Theme | Description |
---|---|
Clinical staff | |
 Scepticism/attitudes | Clinicians held a negative attitude towards the OVT modality [17, 19, 22, 23, 25] |
 Lack of training/experience | |
 Lack of need for OVT | Clinicians were unaware of the need for OVT [22] |
 Lack of time | Clinicians did not have time to familiarise themselves with the OVT modality [22] |
Logistical barriers | |
 Scheduling | Services experienced difficulties incorporating OVT sessions into existing schedules [18, 19, 22] |
 Staffing | Services did not have enough staff to dedicate to OVT implementation [17,18,19, 22] |
 Logistical support | Services lacked the logistical support required to implement OVT [22] |
Technology | |
 Connection | Services lacked the necessary internet infrastructure to implement OVT [19, 22, 24, 36, 37] |
 Set up | Services lacked the expertise to install the OVT software and hardware [17, 19, 22] |
 Technical support | Services lacked the necessary technical support to oversee implementation [17, 22] |
Resources | |
 Space | Services lacked the required space to set up dedicated OVT rooms [18, 24] |
 Equipment | Services lacked the required equipment (e.g., headphones and webcams) [18, 24] |
 Funding | Services lacked the funding required to implement and sustain the OVT service [19] |
Collaboration | |
 Bureaucratic delays | OVT implementation was delayed due to administrative and ethical issues between collaborators [19, 25] |
 Communication | OVT implementation was delayed due to communication issues between collaborators [19] |
Policy | |
 Modifying existing policy | Services needed to modify existing policy to implement OVT [19] |
Clients | |
 Recruitment | Services and researchers struggled to recruit clients to participate in OVT trials [17, 19, 22] |