Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of study participants with comparison between those who did/didn’t report risk of financial hardship

From: Assessing and coping with the financial burden of computed tomography utilization in Limbe, Cameroon: a sequential explanatory mixed-methods study

Variables

Frequency (%)

P value*

Age group (years; N = 344)

 

0.088

 18–24

21 (5.7)

 

 25–34

51 (13.7)

 

 35–44

55 (14.8)

 

 45–54

76 (20.4)

 

 55–64

55 (14.8)

 

 > 65

114 (30.6)

 

Sex (N = 372)

 

0.069

 Female

167 (44.9)

 

 Male

205 (55.1)

 

Marital status (N = 372)

 

0.277

 Married

232 (62.7)

 

 Single

83 (22.3)

 

 Widow(er)

42 (11.3)

 

 Divorced

11 (3.0)

 

 Living in union

4 (1.1)

 

Educational achievement (N = 347)

 

< 0.001

 < O level

158 (45.5)

 

 O level or equivalent

61 (17.6)

 

 A level or equivalent

64 (18.4)

 

 Degree or equivalent

45 (13.0)

 

 Master & above

19 (5.5)

 

Employment status (N = 294)

 

0.001

 Employed, with contract

82 (27.9)

 

 Employed, with no contract

2 (0.7)

 

 Self-employed

115 (39.1)

 

 Unemployed

12 (4.1)

 

 Retired

83 (28.2)

 

Socioeconomic status quintiles (N = 370) from the lowest (1) to the highest (5)

 

< 0.001

 SES quintile 1

74 (20.0)

 

 SES quintile 2

75 (20.3)

 

 SES quintile 3

75 (20.3)

 

 SES quintile 4

79 (21.4)

 

 SES quintile 5

67 (18.1)

 

Health insurance ownership (N = 370)

 

< 0.001

 Yes

38 (10.3)

 

 No

332 (89.7)

 

Number of deponents (N = 272)

 

0.425

 0 to 3

117 (43.0)

 

 4 to 6

97 (35.7)

 

 7 and above

58 (21.4)

 

Presence of chronic illnesses (N = 369)

 

0.232

 Yesa

130 (35.2)

 

 No

239 (64.8)

 
  1. *P values obtained using Fisher’s exact and χ2 tests
  2. a Included in this category are hypertension, diabetes, peptic ulcer disease, cancer, chronic kidney disease, hyperprolactinemia