Skip to main content

Table 2 Post-hoc analysis for the significant results

From: Reaching out to stakeholders: The use of knowledge terminology on the websites of Australian public hospitals

Variables Tested Chi-Square, df p-value More than Expected Fewer than Expected
Size vs MentionedK 26.67, 1  < .001* Large, Yes Large, No
Small, Yes
Size vs MentionedKC 23.86, 1  < .001* Large, Yes Small, Yes
Size vs MentionedKR 18.29, 1  < .001* Large, Yes Small, Yes
Size vs MentionedKS 15.61, 1  < .001* Large, Yes Small, Yes
Size vs MentionedKM 8.51, 1 .004* Large, Yes N/A
Size vs MentionedTotal 24.51, 1  < .001* Large, Yes Small, Yes
State vs MentionedK 24.87, 7  < .001* Vic, Yes WA, Yes
State vs MentionedKC 16.07, 7 .02** Vic, Yes N/A
State vs MentionedTotal 19.88, 7 .006* Vic, Yes N/A
Dom vs MentionedK 59.33, 3  < .001* 3rd, Yes
2nd, Yes
2nd, No
Dom vs MentionedKC 35.09, 3  < .001* 3rd, Yes
2nd, Yes
N/A
Dom vs MentionedKR 22.60, 3  < .001* 3rd, Yes
2nd, Yes
N/A
Dom vs MentionedKS 44.03, 3  < .001* 2nd, Yes 2nd, No
Dom vs MentionedKM 17.17 .001* 2nd, Yes N/A
Dom vs MentionedTotal 49.45, 3  < .001* 3rd, Yes
2nd, Yes
Yes, No
P or O vs MentionedK 89.76, 2  < .001* O, No
P, Yes
O, Yes
P, No
P or O vs MentionedKC 48.98, 2  < .001* P, Yes P, No
P or O vs MentionedKR 25.97, 2  < .001* P, Yes N/A
P or O vs MentionedKS 44.50, 2  < .001* P, Yes P, No
P or O vs MentionedKM 13.17, 2 .001* P, Yes N/A
P or O vs MentionedTotal 68.42, 2  < .001* O, No
P, Yes
P, No
  1. A p-value with an * indicates significance at the 0.01 level while ** indicates significance at the 0.05 level