Development and evaluation of the measurement properties of a generic questionnaire measuring patient perceptions of person-centred care

Fridberg, Helena; Wallin, Lars; Wallengren, Catarina; Kottorp, Anders; Forsman, Henrietta; Tistad, Malin

doi:10.1186/s12913-020-05770-w

Table 4 Summary of the item and fit statistics for items in the initial and revised versions

From: Development and evaluation of the measurement properties of a generic questionnaire measuring patient perceptions of person-centred care

Items	Initial version with 20 items					Missing	Revised version with 18 items
No. Item	Location	SE	Fitresid	Chi sq.	Prob	Missing	Location	SE	Fitresid	Chi sq	Prob
1. Listen to your experiences of health and illness	− 0.550	0.076	− 0.577	8.212	0.413	17 (3)	−0.465	0.077	0.162	5.851	0.664
2. Discuss how health and illness affect ADL	0.489	0.068	0.539	4.349	0.824	39 (7)	0.612	0.070	1.535	1.759	0.988
3. Encouraged to ask questions	0.556	0.066	1.765	15.234	0.055	36 (7)	0.678	0.067	2.985	21.446	0.006
4. Get responses that you understand	−0.610	0.070	−1.167	6.191	0.626	18 (3)	−0.539	0.071	−0.574	6.104	0.636
5. Enough information about care and treatment	−0.336	0.072	−0.998	13.295	0.102	12 (2)	−0.242	0.074	−0.346	11.392	0.180
6. Come to an agreement on the next step in care	−0.083	0.072	0.273	4.763	0.783	57 (10)	0.023	0.073	1.495	5.525	0.700
7. Participate in care-related decisions	0.261	0.070	−0.830	8.650	0.373	49 (9)	0.373	0.071	−0.036	3.145	0.925
8. Important ADLs were considered in planning	0.179	0.061	−1.330	16.214	0.039	56 (10)	0.285	0.062	−0.370	14.087	0.080
9. Important goals set for the planning of care	0.564	0.071	−1.705	9.494	0.302	79 (14)	0.691	0.073	−0.677	9.417	0.308
10. Coordination of contacts within care	0.026	0.063	1.413	12.524	0.129	97 (18)	0.121	0.065	2.546	9.851	0.276
11. Discuss what you can do for yourself	0.174	0.070	−0.105	12.336	0.137	46 (8)	0.284	0.071	1.078	10.606	0.225
12. Resources acknowledged and utilised	0.121	0.062	−1.190	11.295	0.186	50 (9)	0.227	0.063	−0.401	17.046	0.030
13. Opportunity for relatives to participate	−0.302	0.098	3.941	26.325	< 0.001	157 (28)	deleted
14. Opportunity to express when concerned and anxious	−0.140	0.073	−0.143	8.833	0.357	67 (12)	−0.048	0.075	0.764	10.537	0.229
15. Feel as an equal person	−0.214	0.071	1.117	8.407	0.395	13 (2)	−0.117	0.072	1.991	6.329	0.610
16. Trust in the staff/caregiver	−0.968	0.082	−3.093	28.725	< 0.001	10 (2)	−0.911	0.083	−2.742	22.491	0.004
17. Treated with respect	−1.047	0.083	−3.080	21.371	0.006	9 (2)	−0.986	0.085	−2.726	15.126	0.057
18. A plan written together with the staff/caregiver	2.030	0.128	3.934	100.433	< 0.001	153 (28)	deleted
19. Participate in the development of the plan	0.153	0.102	−0.583	9.434	0.307	346 (63)	0.230	0.104	0.096	6.235	0.621
20. Understand the written plan	−0.303	0.122	0.773	4.434	0.816	345 (62)	−0.214	0.124	1.206	3.353	0.910

Analyses have been performed with patients divided into nine class intervals with about 50 persons in each interval for all items, except four items 13, 18, 19 and 20
Items 13 and 18 have approximately 40 persons in each class interval and items 19 and 20 have about 19 persons (class intervals are based on groups within the sample with similar perceived levels of PCC)
Values highlighted in bold in the fit residual column show items with fit residuals outside the recommended range of + − 2.5
Values highlighted in bold in the probability column indicate statistical significance at the 0.05 level following Bonferroni adjustment for the initial version set at 0.002 for 20 items and 0.003 for the revised version with 18 items
Missing responses represented as n (%)

Back to article page

ISSN: 1472-6963

Contact us

General enquiries: journalsubmissions@springernature.com

BMC Health Services Research

Contact us