Skip to main content

Table 8 Availability of electronic ordering

From: Adoption rates of electronic health records in Turkish Hospitals and the relation with hospital sizes

Questions

Hospital Size

Yes***

No***

Not Applicable***

Missing***

P

Electronic ordering for medication

Large (> = 400 beds)

54

(90.0%)

5

(8.3%)

1

(1.7%)

40

0.004**

Medium (100–399 beds)

140

(85.9%)

11

(6.7%)

12

(7.4%)

42

Small (6–99 beds)

241

41

5

8

Percentage

72.5%

9.5%

3.0%

15.0%

Total

435

57

18

90

Electronic ordering for non-medication

Large (> = 400 beds)

41

(97.6%)

1

(2.4%)

0

(0.0%)

58

0.016*

Medium (100–399 beds)

90

(98.9%)

1

(1.1%)

0

(0.0%)

114

Small (6–99 beds)

245

(91.4%)

23

(8.6%)

0

(0.0%)

27

Percentage

62.7%

4.2%

0.0%

33.2%

Total

376

25

0

199

Electronic ordering for nursing and/or physician services

Large (> = 400 beds)

75

(76.5%)

5

(5.1%)

18

(18.4%)

2

0.001**

Medium (100–399 beds)

160

(78.4%)

17

(8.3%)

27

(13.2%)

1

Small (6–99 beds)

239

(81.3%)

37

(12.6%)

18

(6.1%)

1

Percentage

79.0%

9.8%

10.5%

0.7%

Total

474

59

63

4

  1. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 *** The availability of the information system such as PACS, and dictation system is investigated, as in Table 6, using the following set of selections: “Live; Live - hospital-wide; Live - departmental; Installation in Process; Service Not Provided; Not Automated; Missing”. It is just because such an information system can be applied at the departmental level. On the other hand, the availability of administration or application of EHR functions, such as e-order, clinical documentation, etc. is investigated with the following set of selections: “Yes; No; Not Applicable; Missing” since they are either exist or not. If it is reasonable, the prevalence of some of those functions is separately investigated, as in Tables 9 and 14