TY - STD TI - National Institutes of Health. Enhancing Public Input and Transparency in the NIH Research Priority-Setting Process. Bethesda: National Institutes of Health [NIH] (United States). Director's Council of Public Representatives [COPR]; 2004. ID - ref1 ER - TY - STD TI - Buckley DI, Ansari MT, Butler M, Soh C, Chang CS. The refinement of topics for systematic reviews: lessons and recommendations from the effective health care program. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.10.023. ID - ref2 ER - TY - STD TI - Basch E, Aronson N, Berg A, et al. Methodological standards and patient-centeredness in comparative effectiveness research: the PCORI perspective. JAMA. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012.466. ID - ref3 ER - TY - STD TI - Andejeski Y, Breslau ES, Hart E, et al. Benefits and drawbacks of including consumer reviewers in the scientific merit review of breast Cancer research. J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2002. https://doi.org/10.1089/152460902753645263. ID - ref4 ER - TY - STD TI - Institute of Medicine. Finding What Works in Health Care. (Eden J, Levit L, Berg A, Morton S, eds.). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2011. doi:https://doi.org/10.17226/13059. ID - ref5 ER - TY - STD TI - Institute of Medicine. Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. (Graham R, Mancher M, Wolman DM, Greenfield G, Steinberg E, eds.). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2011. https://doi.org/10.17226/13058. ID - ref6 ER - TY - STD TI - Chang SM, Carey TS, Kato EU, Guise JM, Sanders GD. Identifying research needs for improving health care. Ann Intern Med. 2012. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-157-6-201209180-00515. ID - ref7 ER - TY - STD TI - Domecq JP, Prutsky G, Elraiyah T, et al. Patient engagement in research: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-89. ID - ref8 ER - TY - STD TI - Al-Shahi Salman R, Beller E, Kagan J, et al. Increasing value and reducing waste in biomedical research regulation and management. Lancet. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62297-7. ID - ref9 ER - TY - STD TI - Viswanathan M, Ammerman A, Eng E, et al. Community-based participatory research: assessing the evidence. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ). 2004;(99):1-8. ID - ref10 ER - TY - STD TI - Lloyd K, White J. Democratizing clinical research. Nature. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1038/474277a. ID - ref11 ER - TY - STD TI - Saldanha IJ, Petris R, Han G, Dickersin K, Akpek EK. Research questions and outcomes prioritized by patients with dry eye. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.3352. ID - ref12 ER - TY - STD TI - Gandhi GY, Murad MH, Fujiyoshi A, et al. Patient-important outcomes in registered diabetes trials. JAMA. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.299.21.2543. ID - ref13 ER - TY - STD TI - Crowe S, Fenton M, Hall M, Cowan K, Chalmers I. Patients’, clinicians’ and the research communities’ priorities for treatment research: there is an important mismatch. Res Involv Engagem. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-015-0003-x. ID - ref14 ER - TY - STD TI - Loudon K, Santesso N, Callaghan M, et al. Patient and public attitudes to and awareness of clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review with thematic and narrative syntheses. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-321. ID - ref15 ER - TY - STD TI - Fearns N, Kelly J, Callaghan M, et al. What do patients and the public know about clinical practice guidelines and what do they want from them? A qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1319-4. ID - ref16 ER - TY - BOOK PY - 2008 DA - 2008// TI - Knowing What Works in Health Care: A Roadmap for the Nation PB - The National Academies Press CY - Washington, DC UR - https://doi.org/10.17226/12038 DO - 10.17226/12038 ID - ref17 ER - TY - STD TI - Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The Effective Health Care Program. https://www.ahrq.gov/cpi/about/otherwebsites/effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/index.html. Accessed 12 July 2020. UR - https://www.ahrq.gov/cpi/about/otherwebsites/effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/index.html ID - ref18 ER - TY - STD TI - Australian Government. National Health and Medical Resaerch Council. Consumer Involvement. https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelinesforguidelines/plan/consumer-involvement. Accessed 12 July 2020. UR - https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelinesforguidelines/plan/consumer-involvement ID - ref19 ER - TY - STD TI - Wellcome Trust. Planning your public engagement. https://wellcome.ac.uk/grant-funding/guidance/planning-your-public-engagement. Accessed 12 July 2020. UR - https://wellcome.ac.uk/grant-funding/guidance/planning-your-public-engagement ID - ref20 ER - TY - STD TI - Forsythe LP, Carman KL, Szydlowski V, et al. Patient engagement in research: early findings from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Health Aff (Millwood). 2019. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05067. ID - ref21 ER - TY - STD TI - Brett J, Staniszewska S, Mockford C, et al. A systematic review of the impact of patient and public involvement on service users, Researchers and Communities. Patient. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-014-0065-0. ID - ref22 ER - TY - STD TI - The JBI Approach. https://joannabriggs.org/jbi-approach-to-EBHC. Accessed 6 Oct 2020. UR - https://joannabriggs.org/jbi-approach-to-EBHC ID - ref23 ER - TY - STD TI - Carman KL, Maurer M, Yegian JM, et al. Evidence that consumers are skeptical about evidence-based health care. Health Aff. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0296. ID - ref24 ER - TY - STD TI - Carman KL, Maurer M, Mangrum R, et al. Understanding an informed public’s views on the role of evidence in making health care decisions. Health Aff. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1112. ID - ref25 ER - TY - STD TI - Shea B, Santesso N, Qualman A, et al. Consumer-driven health care: building partnerships in research. Health Expect. 2005. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2005.00347.x. ID - ref26 ER - TY - STD TI - Kirwan JR, de Wit M, Frank L, et al. Emerging guidelines for patient engagement in research. Value Heal. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2016.10.003. ID - ref27 ER - TY - STD TI - Mallery C, Ganachari D, Fernandez J, et al. Innovative Methods in Stakeholder Engagement: An Environmental Scan. Prepared by the American Institutes for Research under Contract No. HHSA 290 2010 0005 C. Rockville; 2012. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2012.03.082. ID - ref28 ER - TY - STD TI - Dickersin K, McCurdy E, Coe L, Napoli M. Critical appraisal skills for consumer advocates: assessing a new online course. In: Abstracts of the 13th Cochrane Colloquium. Melbourne: Cochrane Colloquium Abstracts; 2005. ID - ref29 ER - TY - STD TI - Dickersin K, Napoli N, Mayer M, Hamilton M. Critical appraisal skills for consumers: understanding the evidence using an online course on evidence-based health care for consumer advocates. In: Abstracts of the 14th Cochrane Colloquium. Dublin: Cochrane Colloquium Abstracts; 2006. ID - ref30 ER - TY - STD TI - Mayer M, Dickersin K, Costantino C, Hamilton M, Warren B, Werapitya D. Education and training assessment of “Understanding evidence-based healthcare”: a foundation for action, an online course for consumer advocates. In: Abstracts of the 16th Cochrane Colloquium. Freiburg: Cochrane Colloquium Abstracts; 2008. ID - ref31 ER - TY - STD TI - Bowker AH. A test for symmetry in contigency tables. J Am Stat Assoc. 1948. jstor.com/stable/2280710. Accessed 10 Aug 2020. UR - http://jstor.com/stable/2280710 ID - ref32 ER - TY - STD TI - Hoffman A, Montgomery R, Aubry W, Tunis SR. How best to engage patients, doctors, and other stakeholders in designing comparative effectiveness studies. Health Aff. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0675. ID - ref33 ER - TY - STD TI - Cusack L, Del Mar CB, Chalmers I, Gibson E, Hoffmann TC. Educational interventions to improve people’s understanding of key concepts in assessing the effects of health interventions: a systematic review. Syst Rev. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0719-4. ID - ref34 ER - TY - STD TI - Mullins CD, Abdulhalim AM, Lavallee DC. Continuous patient engagement in comparative effectiveness research. JAMA. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012.442. ID - ref35 ER - TY - STD TI - Austvoll-Dahlgren A, Bjørndal A, Odgaard-Jensen J, Helseth S. Evaluation of a web portal for improving public access to evidence-based health information and health literacy skills: a pragmatic trial. PLoS One. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037715. ID - ref36 ER - TY - STD TI - Dickersin K, Braun L, Mead M, et al. Development and implementation of a science training course for breast cancer activists: project LEAD (leadership, education and advocacy development). Health Expect. 2001. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1369-6513.2001.00153.x. ID - ref37 ER - TY - STD TI - U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development, Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development Policy and Program Studies Service; 2010. ID - ref38 ER - TY - STD TI - Car J, Lang B, Colledge A, Ung C, Majeed A. Interventions for enhancing consumers’ online health literacy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd007092.pub2. ID - ref39 ER - TY - STD TI - Berger B, Steckelberg A, Meyer G, Kasper J, Mühlhauser I. Training of patient and consumer representatives in the basic competencies of evidence-based medicine: a feasibility study. BMC Med Educ. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-10-16. ID - ref40 ER -