Skip to main content

Table 4 Cognitive Participation: supporting data

From: Facilitators and “deal breakers”: a mixed methods study investigating implementation of the Goal setting and action planning (G-AP) framework in community rehabilitation teams

Quotes 7–12

7. “G-AP felt like something that was a key process, that you could use from the start right through.” (Nurse; Team C)

8. “We work here as a team as to what’s best for the service user [stroke survivor], you know, when you start from that point, then everything’s achievable.” (Support worker; Team B)

9. “M [nurse; Team C] is retiring next month. I can see this being a problem … she has been the main driver behind G-AP.” (LS field note entry; 07/03/2014)

10. “I’d probably go with the Canadian [Occupational Performance measure] I think [rather than G-AP] because it’s very quick to fill out, it’s relatively simple and it gives you that outcome measure which is obviously something that we can use to back up why we’re doing what we’re doing.” (Occupational Therapist; Team C)

11. “Until you’re familiar with doing it [G-AP], it feels awkward, you know, so you tend to stick with what’s comfortable, what you’re used to [usual practice]. It’s like putting on your old jeans compared to a nice new pair of jeans that feel a bit awkward.” (Psychologist; Team C)

12. “It would be convincing every single team member that you need to be enthusiastic and motivated, that they’re going to get what they need out of it [G-AP].” (Nurse; Team C)