Skip to main content

Table 3 Coherence: supporting data

From: Facilitators and “deal breakers”: a mixed methods study investigating implementation of the Goal setting and action planning (G-AP) framework in community rehabilitation teams

Quotes 1–6

1: “I think the whole idea [of G-AP] is absolutely brilliant!” (Occupational Therapist; Team B)

2: “I really like the structure, the staged cycle of G-AP.” (Physiotherapist; Team B)

3: “There were loads of really good patient scenarios [in the training] and I really understood the [G-AP] system and how to use it.” (Occupational Therapist; Team C)

4: “There’s only so much of training you can get, it’s best just to get on with it I think.” (Support worker; Team A)

5: “I suppose that what’s always been drilled into [us]; setting your SMART goals, it’s got to be something really specific and measurable. Whereas I suppose with the G-AP it is a bit more patient focussed and it’s like, what exactly do they want to do and how do we put it in their kind of words.” (Physiotherapist, Team 3)

6: “G-AP is something we already do in a different name.” (Questionnaire Response 1; Q19).