Skip to main content

Table 1 G-AP informed versus usual goal setting practice

From: Facilitators and “deal breakers”: a mixed methods study investigating implementation of the Goal setting and action planning (G-AP) framework in community rehabilitation teams

G-AP informed goal setting practice

Usual goal setting practice

Theory driven approach incorporating: (i) goal negotiation & setting, (ii) planning (iii) action and (iv) appraisal, feedback & decision making

Various approaches: OT’s used COPM in all teams; SLT’s used Care Aims in Team 3; other disciplines used own approach

Use of the stroke survivor held G-AP to record goals, plans and progress

No stroke survivor held record to record goals, plans and progress

Action plans agreed; coping plans developed to overcome anticipated barriers; confidence to complete plans assessed

Action planning variable; coping plans not routinely discussed; confidence to complete plans not assessed

Ongoing goal and action plan review, appraisal and feedback

Goal review typically at the end of the intervention period

  1. OT Occupational Therapist, COPM Canadian Occupational Performance Measure [28], SLT Speech and Language Therapist; Care Aims: person centred outcomes focused approach (https://careaims.com/about-care-aims/)