Intervention function | Policy category | Affordability | Practicability | (Cost-)Effectiveness | Acceptability | (Side-effects) / Safety | Equity | Does the intervention function meet the APEASE criteria, comments why yes/no? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 | Communication/ marketing | ± | + | ± | ++ | + | + | NO – not affordable, not suitable in our situation |
 | Guidelines | – | ± | ± | + | ++ | ++ | NO – national level ➔ not affordable in our situation |
 | Fiscal measures | – | ± | ± | ± | + | ++ | NO – not affordable in our situation: Germany: Financial burden due to travelling to Tx center, drug usually paid Switzerland: Patients pay Deductible + 10% |
Education, Persuasion, Training, Modeling, Enablement | Regulation | + | + | + | + | + | ++ | YES – center level ➔ regulation about what, how & how long contact with health care provider can continue |
 | Legislation |  |  |  |  |  |  | NO – not relevant, not practicable in our setting |
 | Environmental/ social planning | ± | ± | + | + | + | ++ | NO – WLAN access ➔ not affordable in our situation |
Education, Persuasion, Training, Modelling, Enablement | Service provision | ++ | ++ | + | ++ | ++ | ++ | YES – e.g., support & checks via phone / improvement of performance at visits, introduction of a CC |