Skip to main content

Table 3 Results of bivariate Poisson regression analysis examining individual, institutional, and scientific environment domain factors’ associations with number of QRPs

From: Individual, institutional, and scientific environment factors associated with questionable research practices in the reporting of messages and conclusions in scientific health services research publications

Domain

Factors

B

SE

p-value

Exp(B)

95% CI

Individual

Ambition in science

0.075

0.090

0.404

1.08

0.90–1.28

Self-efficacy

−0.171

0.079

0.031

0.84

0.72–0.98

Perception of received training

−0.008

0.081

0.917

0.99

0.85–1.16

Confidence in writing

−0.111

0.083

0.180

0.89

0.76–1.05

Pressure to create societal impact

0.289

0.064

0.000

1.34

1.18–1.51

Perception of contribution to science.

0.102

0.069

0.139

1.11

0.97–1.27

Institution

Specific training in reporting messages and conclusions

−0.169

0.048

0.000

0.85

0.77–0.93

Competitiveness

0.089

0.053

0.091

1.09

0.98–1.21

Data storage

−0.045

0.054

0.404

0.96

0.86–1.06

Feedback culture at institute

0.022

0.051

0.666

1.02

0.93–1.13

Social support

−0.034

0.084

0.683

0.97

0.82–1.14

Media policy

0.018

0.059

0.757

1.02

0.91–1.14

Influence of funders

−0.068

0.065

0.296

0.93

0.82–1.06

Environment

Creating exciting conclusion

0.019

0.070

0.783

1.02

0.89–1.17

Media contact

−0.018

0.061

0.769

0.98

0.87–1.11

Pressure from scientific culture

0.048

0.071

0.495

1.05

0.91–1.21

Suspicions of co-workers

−0.100

0.071

0.160

0.91

0.79–1.04

Journal practice

−0.089

0.067

0.186

0.92

0.80–1.04

Stakeholder influence

0.146

0.047

0.002

1.16

1.06–1.27

Co-author conflict of interest

−0.100

0.057

0.082

0.91

0.81–1.01

Conflict between co-authors

−0.077

0.045

0.087

0.93

0.85–1.01