Skip to main content

Table 2 Multiply imputed effects and costs for the Namaste program group (n = 116) and usual care group (n = 115) after 12 months

From: Cost-effectiveness of the Namaste care family program for nursing home residents with advanced dementia in comparison with usual care: a cluster-randomized controlled trial

Outcomes

Mean (SE)

Mean difference (95%CI)c

 

Namaste Care Family program (n = 116)

Usual care (n = 115)

 

Quality of Life in Late-Stage Dementia (QUALID) score (11–55)b

Baseline

24.19 (0.80)

22.37 (0.71)

−0.060 (− 0.42; 0.30)a

T1

24.95 (0.77)

22.87 (0.74)

T2

24.51 (0.79)

22.46 (0.73)

T3

23.88 (0.89)

21.85 (0.74)

T4

23.40 (2.25)

22.51 (1.04)

Gain in Alzheimer Care Instrument (GAIN) score (0–40)

Baseline

24.94 (0.80)

22.77 (0.82)

0.033 (−0.24; 0.31)a

T1

24.96 (0.81)

22.60 (1.03)

T2

23.93 (1.02)

23.06 (0.93)

T3

22.09 (1.21)

23.32 (0.99)

T4

26.26 (1.74)

23.62 (1.37)

Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY) (0–1)

0.40 (0.026)

0.39 (0.022)

0.015 (−0.058; 0.088)

Healthcare costs

 Secondary care

251 (110)

361 (151)

−110 (− 529; 215)

 Medication

5430 (777)

6432 (1047)

− 1002 (− 3971; 1268)

 Total healthcare costs

5682 (802)

6793 (1065)

− 1111 (− 4071; 1246)

 Donations

105 (16)

0 (0)

105 (76; 139)

 Structural

211 (29)

0 (0)

211 (163; 276)

 Extra staff

477 (89)

0 (0)

477 (325; 681)

 Total intervention costs

793 (110)

0 (0)

793 (602; 1036)

Non-healthcare costs

 Family

698 (121)

691 (131)

7 (− 288; 303)

Total societal costs

7173 (852)

7484 (1087)

− 311 (− 3397; 2097)

  1. aOverall effect over time corrected for score at baseline
  2. bA lower QUALID score indicates improved health. A higher QUALID score indicates worse health
  3. cUncertainty around cost differences estimated using the non-parametric bootstrap
  4. SE standard error, 95%CI 95% confidence interval
  5. Multiple imputation model consisted of variables that differed at baseline, were related to missing data or were associated with the outcome: age of family caregiver, age of person with dementia, country of birth of person with dementia, country of birth of family caregiver, gender person with dementia, gender of family caregiver, relation of family caregiver with person with dementia, marital status of person with dementia, highest completed education of person with dementia and having a payed job for the family caregiver