Skip to main content

Table 1 Descriptives of the Namaste Care Family group and usual care group at baseline

From: Cost-effectiveness of the Namaste care family program for nursing home residents with advanced dementia in comparison with usual care: a cluster-randomized controlled trial

 

Namaste Care Family program

Usual care

 

n

Mean (SD) / % (n)

n

Mean (SD) / % (n)

P-valuec

Person with dementia

 

Age (years)

110

83.3 (8.1)

113

86.0 (6.9)

.010*

Gender (% female)

116

71% (82)

114

75% (85)

.510

% born in the Netherlands

108

82% (88)

110

94% (103)

.006*

Educational level

    

.374

 None or primary school

106

43% (45)

110

35% (39)

 

  (High school preparing for) technical/trade school

106

44% (47)

110

54% (59)

 High school preparing for BSc or MSc

106

4% (4)

110

6% (6)

BSc or MSc degree

106

9% (10)

110

6% (6)

Dementia severitya

115

14.7 (4.8)

112

15.3 (4.2)

.294

Utilityb (0–1)

115

0.46 (0.29)

112

0.44 (0.24)

.460

Family caregivers

Age (years)

108

61.8 (11.1)

107

63.4 (11.4)

.297

Gender (% female)

108

75% (81)

110

68% (75)

.265

% born in the Netherlands

108

85% (92)

110

97% (107)

.002*

Educational level

    

.112

 None or primary school

108

2% (2)

110

8% (9)

 

 (High school preparing for) technical/trade school

108

52% (56)

110

52% (57)

 High school preparing for BSc or MSc

108

8% (9)

110

11% (12)

 BSc or MSc degree

108

38% (41)

110

29% (32)

Relation with person with dementia

    

.578

 Spouse / partner

109

22% (24)

112

17% (19)

 

 Daughter or son (in law)

109

65% (71)

112

66% (74)

 Other

109

14% (15)

112

15% (17)

  1. a as measured by the Bedford Alzheimer Nursing Severity-Scale b as measured by the EQ-5D-3L c Baseline differences were tested using t-tests for continuous variables and chi-square tests for categorical variables * P < .05, BSc Bachelor, MSc Master, SD Standard Deviation