Skip to main content

Table 3 Summary of Studies on the Effect of CON on Mortality for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) Procedures

From: Certificate of need laws: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis

STUDY

DESIGN

STATES

YEARS

POP-ULATION

CONTROLS

ESTIMATED EFFECT OF CON ON MORTALITY

NOTES

Mortality measure

Mean change1

Stand-ard error

Net change, deaths per 1000 patients2

Pop-ulation weight3

Recency weight4

Total Population Studies

Ho [65]

Retro-spective cohort

18 CON vs. 8 no CON

1988–2000

All

State fixed effects, patient characteristics

Inpatient mortality

−2.6%

0.8%

−1.00

77.1%

50.0%

Only one state in sample dropped CON during the study period. Finds no mortality effect of CON on PTCA. SE imputed from reported t statistic.

DiSesa et al. [52]

Retro-spective cohort

27 CON vs. 24 no CON

2000–2003

All

State and hospital fixed effects, patient controls

Operative mortality

−4.9%

5.7%

−1.25

100.0%

100.0%

 

Robinson et al. [42]

Pre-post

PA

1994–1999

All

Patient characteristics

Inpatient mortality

0.0%

0.9%

0.00

0.0%

50.0%

After CON lifted, actual mortality matched expected mortality for both old and new cardiac programs; uses same PHC4 data as Kolstad

Kolstad [39]

Pre-post

PA

1994–2003

All

Compares incumbent hospitals to new entrants

 

2.9%

0.9%

0.62

4.3%

100.0%

Kolstad calculates that 11 deaths are averted annually by CON repeal. His Table 1.1 shows that in 2000–2003, the 40 incumbent hospitals performed an average of 349 CABGs, for a total of 13,960 (RAMR = 2.17%) while 24 new entrants performed an average of 160 (RAMR = 2.04%). Weighted average mortality = 2.14% vs. 2.20% if 11 additional deaths had occurred.

Cutler et al. [53]

Pre-post

PA

1994–2003

All

Compares incumbent hospitals to new entrants

 

2.9%

0.9%

0.62

0.0%

100.0%

Essentially the same paper as Kolstad [39]

Weighted average:

        

−1.13

   

Medicare Patient Studies

Vaughan-Sarrazin et al. [57]

Retro-spective cohort

27 continuous CON vs. 18 no CON

1994–1999

Medicare (excludes managed care)

Patient characteristics

In-hospital mortality

−17.3%

2.6%

− 8.70

77.1%

25.0%

States without CON exhibited CABG higher mortality (OR = 1.22) than states with continuous CON; this implies CON is associated with an 17.3% decrease in mortality rates, derived algebraically. No effect in intermittent CON states

Popescu et al. [58]

Retro-spective cohort

27 CON vs. 23 no CON

1998–2000

Medicare

Patient characteristics

30-day all-cause mortality

−5.0%

1.0%

−8.90

100.0%

50.0%

 

DiSesa et al. [52]

Retro-spective cohort

27 CON vs. 24 no CON

2001

Medicare patients age 65 and older (excludes managed care)

State and hospital fixed effects, patient controls

Operative mortality

−0.3%

4.9%

−0.10

100.0%

75.0%

 

Popescu, Vaughan-Sarazin and Rosenthal [55]

Retro-spective cohort

27 CON vs. 24 no CON

2000–2003

Medicare (age 68+)

Patient characteristics

30-day all-cause mortality

0.0%

1.5%

0.00

100.0%

100.0%

Vaughan-Sarazin is co-author on this paper; her most recent work, using the most recent data she uses, finds zero effect (a true 0.00 estimate; not just statistically insignificant)

Ho et al. [59]

Retro-spective cohort

27 continuous CON vs. 7 dropped CON

1989–2002

Medicare patients age 65 and older (excludes managed care)

State fixed effects, extensive hospital and patient controls

Procedural mortality

10.8%

3.3%

5.20

63.9%

100.0%

Dropping CON reduces mortality at first, but the effect dissipates 5 years after CON is removed

Weighted average:

        

−0.93

   

Popescu, Vaughan-Sarazin and Rosenthal [55]

Retro-spective cohort

27 CON vs. 24 no CON

2000–2003

Medicare (age 68+)

Patient characteristics

30-day all-cause mortality

−4.2%

2.6%

−7.31

100.0%

100.0%

States with stringent CON lower mortality but effect is of borderline statistical significance

  1. 1Mean change in probability of death, calculated by authors using data reported at original source
  2. 2All figures calculated by authors: 1000 x (Mean Mortality Rate in CON States) x (1–1/(1 + Mean Change)) using data on the mean mortality rate for the relevant population and mortality measure shown as reported at original source
  3. 3Population weights represent the fraction of the theoretical population of interest included in a study. All figures are calculated by authors based on the total number of CABG surgeries in 2008, allocated to states based on 2008 Census figures on total adult population age 18 and older (for total population studies) and total population age 65 and older (for Medicare patient studies). A weight of zero has been assigned to studies that either duplicate other reported findings or have been entirely superseded by analyses using the same (overlapping) data source but with additional newer years of data
  4. 4Recency weights are calculated to provide greater weight to results that rely on more recent data and/or improved methods