Social inequalities in cervical cancer screening: a discrete choice experiment among French general practitioners and gynaecologists

Table 1 Attributes and modalities included in scenarios according to qualitative interviews and literature

Population of women targeted	Stakeholders in screening itself	UCC screening technique(s)	Inducement to women to undergo screening	Inducement to general practitioners
All women ^a	Current stakeholders ^a	Pap smear ^a	Current incentives for screening ^a	No change in remuneration or logistic support ^a
Unscreened women	Current stakeholders and state-registered nurses	Choice between Pap smear or self-collected oncogenic papillomavirus testing	Mailed invitation without involving attending physician	Increasing fee for performing Pap smear
Women from areas with low rates of screening	Current stakeholders and radiologists during mammography	Self-collected oncogenic papillomavirus testing	Mailed invitation involving attending physician	Increasing fee for performance concerning UCC screening
Women receiving free supplementary universal health coverage	Current stakeholders and state-registered nurses and radiologists during mammography		Mailing of screening prescription	Communication of lists of unscreened women to practitioner
Women over 50 years old			Delivery of screening prescription by occupational physicians	Fixed fee for time spent on screening
Women from deprived areas			Delivery of screening prescription by student health services	Remuneration of consultations dedicated to uterine cervical cancer screening

^a This first ‘neutral’ modality reflected UCC (Uterine Cervical Cancer) screening opportunistic program status of French women between 25 and 65 years old

ISSN: 1472-6963