Skip to main content

Table 5 Multivariable analysis to identify factors associated with client’s satisfaction with sick child services. Ethiopian Service Provision Assessment Plus Survey 2014

From: Assessing the quality of care in sick child services at health facilities in Ethiopia

Facility/provider characteristics

Model I

Model II

Model III

Model IV

β Coeff

95% CI

β Coeff

95% CI

β Coeff

95% CI

β Coeff

95% CI

Facility managing authority

 Public

Reference

 

Reference

 

Reference

   

 Private or Non-governmental organization

0.44 *

(0.26, 0.63)

0.43 *

(0.25, 0.60)

0.44 *

(0.26, 0.63)

  

Urban/Rural

 Urban

Reference

 

Reference

 

Reference

   

 Rural

0.04

(−0.09, 0.17)

0.09

(−0.02, 0.21)

0.04

(− 0.09, 0.16)

  

Facility type

 Hospitals

Reference

 

Reference

 

Reference

   

 Health centers

−0.08

(− 0.23, 0.06)

0.06

(− 0.06, 0.18)

− 0.09

(− 0.23, 0.06)

  

 Health posts

− 0.20

(− 0.53, 0.14)

0.08

(− 0.19, 036)

− 0.19

(− 0.53, 0.14)

  

 Clinics

−0.35 *

(− 0.62, − 0.08)

−0.20

(− 0.40, 0.002)

−0.35*

(− 0.62, − 0.08)

  

Provider in the facility received sick child care training in the past two years

 No

Reference

 

Reference

 

Reference

   

 Yes

0.11 *

(0.02, 0.21)

0.11 *

(0.01, 0.20)

0.11 *

(0.02, 0.20)

  

Caregivers education level

 No formal education

Reference

 

Reference

 

Reference

   

 Primary

0.01

(−0.10, 0.13)

0.01

(− 0.11, 0.12)

0.02

(−0.10, 0.13)

  

 Secondary

0.10

(−0.03, 0.23)

0.08

(−0.05, 0.20)

0.10

(−0.03, 0.22)

  

 Higher

0.002

(− 0.14, 0.15)

−0.01

(− 0.15, 0.13)

0.005

(− 0.14, 0.15)

  

 Structure composite indicator

      

0.03

(− 0.01, 0.08)

 Routine management meetings

0.06

(−0.13, 0.26)

  

0.07

(−0.13, 0.26)

  

 System to collect client opinion

−0.08

(− 0.22, 0.06)

  

− 0.08

(− 0.22, 0.06)

  

 Quality assurance system

0.03

(−0.09, 0.14)

  

0.03

(−0.09, 0.14)

  

 Supervision

0.16

(−0.03, 0.35)

  

0.16

(−0.03, 0.35)

  

 Health workers always available

−0.10

(− 0.29, 0.10)

  

− 0.10

(− 0.29, 0.09)

  

 IMCI guide followed

−0.01

(− 0.13, 0.10)

  

− 0.02

(− 0.13, 0.10)

  

 Diagnose and/or treat malaria

0.20

(−0.21, 0.61)

  

0.21

(−0.20, 0.62)

  

 Number of basic amenities

−0.08*

(− 0.13, − 0.03)

  

− 0.08*

(−0.13, − 0.03)

  

 Number of infection prevention precautions

−0.02

(− 0.06, 0.02)

  

− 0.02

(− 0.06, 0.02)

  

 Number of sick child equipment available

0.03

(−0.02, 0.07)

  

0.03

(−0.02, 0.07)

  

 IMCI mother’s card

0.10

(−0.01, 0.20)

  

0.10

(−0.007, 0.20)

  

 Process composite indicator

      

0.04

(−0.003, 0.09)

 Provider used visual aids

  

0.11

(−0.21, 0.43)

0.14

(−0.18, 0.46)

  

 Provider discussed follow-up visit

  

0.06

(−0.05, 0.17)

0.04

(−0.07, 0.15)

  

 Number of symptoms checked

  

0.01

(−0.02, 0.04)

0.01

(−0.02, 0.04)

  

 Number of physical examinations of sick child

  

0.004

(−0.02, 0.03)

0.002

(−0.02, 0.02)

  

 Number of information provided to caregiver

  

−0.02

(−0.05, 0.02)

− 0.01

(− 0.05, 0.02)

  

Random effect (region)

 Variance (SE)

0.07 (0.04)

(0.03, 0.19)

0.08 (0.04)

(0.03, 0.21)

0.07 (0.04)

(0.03, 0.18)

  

 ICC

0.069

0 .079

0.068

  

Model fitness

 AIC

5349.299

5353.751

5356.999

5416.084

 BIC

5482.59

5448.166

5518.06

5438.299

  1. *P-value< 0.05, **p-value< 0.001
  2. CI Confidence Interval, SE Standard Error, AIC Akaike Information Criterion, BIC Bayesian information criterion, LL Log Likelihood