Skip to main content

Table 1 Table of participants. This table provides a breakdown of the interviews and their dates in three columns. Pseudonyms or numerical identifiers were used for all participants. Key staff interviews were face-to-face, all other interviews were conducted by phone. A table key explains the key participant characteristics

From: Applying critical systems thinking to social prescribing: a relational model of stakeholder “buy-in”

Key Staff*

Year

Other stakeholders*

Year

Service users

code

Year

Ref

Link worker (Carol)

2018

Practice manager (Keith)

2018

Female

000

2018

CVD

Public health manager (Joan)

2018

DWP Disability Employment Advisor (Sue)

2019

Female

001

2018

CVD

Project Manager (Ken)

2018

DWP Employment Advisor (Pat)

2019

Female

002

2018

CVD

IT manager (Chris)

2018

DWP Employment Advisor (Ann)

2019

Male

003

2018

CVD

Service manager (Kath)

2018

Adult social care worker (Jill)

2019

Male

004

2018

CVD

Public Health consultant (Elise)

2018

Adult social care worker (Mel)

2019

Male

005

2018

CVD

Link worker (Emily)

2019

GP (Nick)

2019

Female

006

2019

Other

  

GP (Liz)

2019

Female

007

2019

Other

    

Male

008

2019

MH

    

Female

009

2019

Other

  1. Key: Participant Characteristics
  2. • Link worker = social prescribing link worker
  3. • DWP = Department of Work and Pensions
  4. • Code = anonymous code for paper only
  5. • Ref = referrals
  6. • Service user = a person who has met with a social prescribing link worker
  7. • CVD = service user is on a CVD register
  8. • Other = service user has been identified or self identifies as having health issues related to life style, weight.
  9. • MH = patient has been identified as having mental health issues
  10. Note: Key staff interviews were face to face, all other interviews were conducted by phone