Skip to main content

Table 4 Prediction of yearly patient visits to the primary diabetes care provider

From: The impact of accessibility and service quality on the frequency of patient visits to the primary diabetes care provider: results from a cross-sectional survey performed in six European countries

 

Participants with up to two missing values (n = 1086)

Patients with complete data (n = 829)

Parametera

%-changeb

%-contc

Parametera

%-changeb

%-contc

Constant

0.540***

  

0.577***

  

Control variables

 Finnish regiond

− 0.218**

−19.59

7.77

− 0.248**

−21.94

8.64

 German regiond

0.361***

43.48

0.330***

39.08

 Greek regiond

0.541***

71.77

0.545***

72.46

 Dutch regiond

0.163**

17.70

0.163**

17.74

 Spanishd

0.411***

50.83

0.515***

67.30

 Male gender

− 0.001

− 0.10

0.03

− 0.001

− 0.12

0.03

 Age in years

0.043

4.39

0.08

0.036

3.69

0.06

 High education

− 0.059

−5.73

0.12

−0.051

−4.99

0.10

 Oral medicaments, no insuline

0.107

11.29

0.80

0.122

12.96

0.53

 Insuline

0.241***

27.25

0.208**

23.16

 Heart problems

0.044

4.50

0.06

0.058

5.95

0.10

 Previous stroke

0.166**

18.06

0.34

0.109

11.47

0.12

 Extremities problems

0.332***

39.38

2.37

0.330***

39.05

2.36

 Sight problems

−0.017

−1.69

0.01

− 0.023

−2.26

0.01

 Kidney problems

−0.938**

−60.86

0.53

−0.856**

−57.53

0.58

Focal predictors

 Travel distance (km)

−0.011***

−1.09

1.06

−0.010***

−0.99

0.97

 Travel time (minutes)

0.002

0.20

0.09

0.003

0.30

0.20

 In-practice waiting time (minutes)

−0.001*

− 0.10

0.21

− 0.002*

− 0.16

0.30

 Quality of communicationf

0.127***

13.54

3.71

0.121***

12.85

3.26

  1. a Asterisks behind the values symbolize statistical significances for deviation from zero with * = p < 0.05, ** = p < 0.01, and *** = p < 0.001
  2. b Percentage of increase or, respectively, decrease of yearly visits when the respective predictor variable increases for one unit
  3. c Contribution of the respective predictor variable to the prediction of the complete model (one hundred times the difference between the CW-Indices for the complete model and the models without the respective predictor variable)
  4. d The reference category is England
  5. e The reference category is treatment only by diet
  6. f Coded from 1 for worst quality to 5 for best quality