Skip to main content

Table 4 Differences regarding patient satisfaction between patients treated in 2013 and patients treated in 2015

From: Improving clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction among patients with coronary artery disease: an example of enhancing regional integration between a cardiac centre and a referring hospital

Patient satisfaction variable

2013

n = 108

2015

n = 108

p

A. Patient information and education

7.47

7.98

.013

B. Expectation management

7.69

8.09

.127

C. Alignment between both hospitals

7.33

7.62

.214

D. Communication with the GP (SJG Weert)

7.24

7.77

.086

E. Communication with the GP (Catharina)

7.33

7.73

.189

F. Duration to approach and pathway (SJG Weert)

8.09

8.18

.729

G. Duration to approach and pathway (Catharina)

7.53

7.95

.134

H. Quality of care (SJG Weert)

7.95

8.46

.007

I. Quality of care (Catharina)

8.08

8.43

.057

J. Admission and stay (SJG Weert)

8.00

8.39

.032

K. Admission and stay (Catharina)

8.17

8.41

.155

L. General mark (SJG Weert)

7.80

8.29

.007

M. General mark (Catharina)

8.13

8.42

.070

N. Personal contact between patient and physician (SJG Weert)

7.90

8.32

.024

O. Personal contact between patient and physician (Catharina)

7.67

8.20

.031