Skip to main content

Table 4 Statements with the least influence on the use of eRehabilitation

From: Differences in factors influencing the use of eRehabilitation after stroke; a cross-sectional comparison between Brazilian and Dutch healthcare professionals

Statement

I would not use e-rehabilitation, if…

Factor of Grol

Barrier/ facilitator

Brazil (n = 99)

Netherlands (n = 105)

   

Median (IQR)

Ranking

Median (IQR)

Ranking

The patient has too many physical disabilities after stroke

Patient characteristic

B

2 (1–2)a

88

1 (1–2)

88

The patient has too much aphasia after stroke

Patient characteristic

B

2 (1–2)a

87

2 (1–2)

87

I believe that there will be problems with software

Resources

B

2 (1–3)a

86

.

76

There is too little scientific evidence for the effectiveness of eRehabilitation

Professional motivation not to change

B

2 (1–3)a

85

2 (2–3)

82

Implementation of eRehabilitation happened simultaneously with other ICT projects

Organization of care

B

2 (2–3)a

84

.

74

The patient has too many cognitive disabilities after stroke

Patient characteristic

B

2 (2–3)a

83

2 (2–3)

85

The patient has visual problems

Patient characteristic

B

2 (2–3)a

82

2 (2–3)

80

Problems with the devices on which eRehabilitation is used

Resources

B

3 (1–4)

81

3 (1–3)

79

Problems with the internet connection

Resources

B

3 (1–4)

80

3 (1–3)

81

The patient cannot compare his/her results with the scores of other stroke patients

Attractiveness

F

3 (2–3)a

79

2 (1–3)

86

I cannot compare patients results with the scores of other stroke patients

Attractiveness

F

.

74

2 (2–3)

84

The healthcare professional contacts the patients if he/she exercises too little

Organization of care

F

.

70

2 (2–3)

83

  1. · = no part of least influencing statements, B; barrier, F; facilitator, IQR; Interquartile range
  2. aIn the top-ten when only physical therapists, rehabilitation physicians and psychologist are included