Table 3 Statements with the most influence on the use of eRehabilitation
Statement I would use e-rehabilitation, if… | Factor | Barrier/ facilitator | Brazil (n = 99) | Netherlands (n = 105) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Median (IQR) | Ranking | Median (IQR) | Ranking | |||
It contributes to the patient’s therapy compliance | Patient motivation to change | F | 4 (4–4)a | 1 | 4 (4–4) | 8 |
eRehabilitation has a positive influence on recovery | Patient motivation to change | F | 4 (4–4)a | 2 | 4 (4–4) | 2 |
I can tailor the content of eRehabilitation to the patient’s personal situation | Feasibility | F | 4 (4–4)a | 3 | . | 12 |
I have time to (learn to) use eRehabilitation | Organization of care | F | 4 (4–4)a | 4 | . | 21 |
I feel supported from within the organization to use eRehabilitation | Organization of care | F | 4 (4–4)a | 5 | . | 32 |
eRehabilitation offers a way to independently continue therapy after discharge | Patient motivation to change | F | 4 (4–4)a | 6 | . | 15 |
ICT-problems are solved directly | Organization of care | F | 4 (4–4)a | 7 | 4 (4–4) | 7 |
Logging on is easy | Accessibility | F | 4 (4–4)a | 8 | 4 (4–4) | 3 |
My patient wants to use eRehabilitation | Patient motivation to change | F | 4 (4–4)a | 9 | . | 11 |
Exercises to train cognitive functioningb | Attractiveness | F | 4 (4–4)a | 10 | . | 55 |
A helpdesk is available for patients | Feasibility | F | . | 13 | 4 (4–4) | 1 |
Video instructions on how to use e-rehabilitation are available for patients | Feasibility | F | . | 17 | 4 (4–4) | 4 |
A menu with frequently asked questions (FAQ) for patients | Feasibility | F | . | 21 | 4 (4–4) | 5 |
The patient can read information about stroke | Feasibility | F | . | 19 | 4 (4–4) | 6 |
Decisions made during a consult are documented and visible for patientsb | Advantage of Use | F | . | 67 | 4 (4–4) | 9 |
Insights in goals that are achieve | Attractiveness | F | . | 24 | 4 (3–4) | 10 |