Skip to main content

Table 2 Strategies rated as both important and feasible by all stakeholder groups

From: Selecting and tailoring implementation interventions: a concept mapping approach

Priority

Strategies

Importance

Feasibility

Reported Benefits

1

Offer an electronic fillable FOCUS form (e.g. on tablet/iPad/online/laptop)

4.1

4.5

Improves data collection/submission environment

2

Share what is done at the ministry level to look at program effectiveness using the FOCUS

4.1

4.4

SLPs will know what happens to the FOCUS data they collect and submit

3

Make translations of FOCUS available

4.1

4.4

The data collected from FOCUS will be clinically valid

4

Improve readability of the FOCUS (e.g. increase the font size and bubble size, shading the items)

4.1

4.3

Improves data collection/submission environment

5

Make sure FOCUS scores can support functional/clinically-related activities (e.g. helping clinicians form goals)

4.1

4.1

SLPs will know how they can use the FOCUS data in their practice

6

Offer a way for FOCUS to be completed and submitted by parents at home e.g. online/over the phone

4.1

4

Improves data collection/submission environment

7

Keep the dialogue open with SLPs to see what can be improved/ changed

4

4.3

Research on the FOCUS will incorporate clinical expertise, and be more relevant to practice

8

Provide a way that automatically calculates scores/statistics of FOCUS (including change scores from the last FOCUS and the subscale scores)

4.2

3.8

Improves data collection/submission environment

9

Make sure FOCUS is valid even if different parents/caregivers/SLPs are completing them

3.9

4.6

The data collected from FOCUS will be clinically valid

10

Create an electronic system that streamlines all administration of FOCUS (e.g. can see all FOCUS of the same child in tabs)

3.9

3.5

Improves data collection/submission environment

11

Share successful research findings with the use of FOCUS (specify the details of the intervention and how FOCUS data was collected)

3.8

4.8

SLPs will know how submitted FOCUS data was used in clinical research

12

Change the schedule of FOUCS such that administration is timed to clinical appointments (e.g. assessment/intervention/discharge) rather than saying every 6 months

3.8

3.3

Improves data collection/submission environment

13

Remove the need to transfer FOCUS score by having an app that connects FOCUS data to the ministry (i.e. remove the need to transfer paper to electronic format)

3.8

3.5

Improves data collection/submission environment

14

Provide more timely feedback about FOCUS outcomes to SLPs (rather than at PSL meetings only)

3.7

4.3

SLPs will know what happens to the FOCUS data they collect and submit