Skip to main content

Table 3 Changes in job satisfaction among all healthcare providers following EnPHC Interventions

From: The effects of enhanced primary healthcare interventions on primary care providers’ job satisfaction

Job satisfaction

Intervention Group

Control Group

Difference*

Coefficient (SE)

95% CI

p-value

Baseline

n = 544

17 months

n = 645

Baseline

n = 498

17 months

n = 570

1. Some parts of my work do not really make sense

2.65

(0.79)

2.56

(0.76)

2.60

(0.81)

2.62

(0.78)

−0.11

−0.120 (0.094)

− 0.302, 0.066

0.210

2. My work still interests me as much as it ever did

3.10

(0.58)

3.26

(0.58)

3.10

(0.58)

3.27

(0.60)

- 0.01

−0.001 (0.064)

− 0.127, 0.124

0.980

3. Overloaded with unnecessary administrative detail

2.31

(0.71)

2.38

(0.72)

2.25

(0.74)

2.43

(0.73)

−0.11

− 0.108 (0.071)

− 0.248, 0.032

0.130

4. Too much stress

2.47

(0.74)

2.43

(0.70)

2.45

(0.73)

2.55

(0.68)

−0.14

−0.139 (0.065)

−0.266,

− 0.012

0.032

5. Well-respected job

3.39

(0.69)

3.33

(0.70)

3.33

(0.66)

3.36

(0.70)

−0.09

−0.083 (0.060)

−0.200, 0.034

0.166

6. Good balance between effort and reward

2.88

(0.69)

2.92

(0.65)

2.92

(0.62)

2.95

(0.65)

0.01

0 (0.078)

−0.153, 0.154

0.995

  1. HCP healthcare provider, CI confidence interval
  2. *Change from baseline to 17 months, intervention group versus control group
  3. Note: Outcomes are adjusted for age, gender, educational level, professional roles, working duration in primary care settings, hours spent per week on direct patient care, location of clinics (urban/rural)