Skip to main content

Table 2 Description of fall risk assessment tools used in SCI rehabilitation settings. Column three represents the maximum score (a high score infers a higher fall risk). The thresholds for assigning fall risk based on the scores are specified in column four

From: Current state of fall prevention and management policies and procedures in Canadian spinal cord injury rehabilitation

Scale Name

Domains Evaluated

Maximum Score

Interpretation

STRATIFY [17]

recent falls, agitation, vision, toileting frequency, transfers and mobility

6

0 = low fall risk

1 = medium fall risk

2 + = high fall risk

Schmid Fall Risk Assessment Tool [18]

mobility, mentation, elimination, prior fall history and current medications, agitation, attempting to get out of bed unsafely, vision, orthostatic hypotension, balance and sensory issues, history of fractures or osteoporosis, alcohol/substance abuse and malnutrition

5

0–2 = normal fall risk

≥3 = high fall risk

Morse Fall Scale [19]

fall history, secondary diagnosis, ambulatory aid, IV, gait/transfers, and cognition

125

0–24 = low fall risk

25–44 = moderate fall risk

≥45 = high fall risk

Customized Scale Site D

history of falls, medication, dizziness, sensory impairments, toileting, cognitive impairments, balance/mobility issues, co-morbidities, bed transfers/mobility, mobility in patient room, bathroom and on the unit, and behavioural traits (e.g. judgement, self-control/impulsivity, anxiety)

Yes or No scale

Any yes answer requires development of a plan

Customized Scale Site E

neuromuscular deficits, cognition, sensory deficits, bowel/bladder, postural hypotension, history of seizures

17

0 = low fall risk

≥1 = high fall risk

Customized Scale Site F

*based on the Morse fall scale

number of diagnoses, vision, toileting, medication, mobility, and cognition

100

0–64 = low fall risk

≥65 = high fall risk