From: Implementing continuity of midwife carer – just a friendly face? A realist evaluation
Source | Number | Dates | Type of data |
---|---|---|---|
Sources informing initial programme theories | |||
Published literature | From Nov 2016 | Papers and reports | |
Stakeholder interviews | 4 leaders at macro level | June – Sept 2017 | Interview transcripts |
Baseline survey | 321 midwives responded | Oct – Dec 2017 | Survey data including free text |
Participant observations | Local and national events | From Jan 2017 | Field notes |
Sources for testing programme theories (in addition to above) | |||
Facilitated CMC Team Meetings | 12 meetings | Dec 2018 - Aug 2019 | Field notes & summaries |
CMC team surveys | 15 (Team 1: 11 surveys, 50 responses; Team 2: 2 surveys, 18 responses) | Jan -Sept 2019 | Quality improvement survey data |
Local implementation meetings | Feb 2017 - Sept 2019 | Field notes | |
National implementation and leader meetings | May 2018 - Sept 2019 | Field notes | |
Women receiving CMC from local teams | 89 women | Feb – Nov 2019 | Service evaluation questionnaire data including free text |
Wider workforce not in CMC team | 36 midwives: 12 community and 24 hospital based | Feb- March 2019 | Audit data |
Participant observations | National stakeholder events | March 2017 and May 2019 | Field notes |
One-to-one midwife interviews | 9 midwives: 4 leaders (3 not in health board); 2 in CMC teams; 3 in standard model. | May – Aug 2019 | Interview transcripts |