Table 4 Recommended1 and actual number of facilities with basic and comprehensive PAC capability, nationally and by province, Zimbabwe 2016
National and provinces | Basic | Comprehensive | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended | Actual | Proportion of facilities meeting recommend levels | Recommended | Actual | Proportion of facilities meeting recommend levels | |
National | 116 | 47 | 41% | 29 | 16 | 55% |
Bulawayo | 6 | 1 | 17% | 1 | 0 | 0% |
Matabeleland South | 6 | 1 | 17% | 1 | 1 | 67% |
Mashonaland East | 12 | 2 | 17% | 3 | 1 | 34% |
Midlands | 14 | 3 | 21% | 4 | 0 | 0% |
Mashonaland Central | 10 | 3 | 29% | 3 | 1 | 39% |
Matabeleland North | 7 | 2 | 30% | 2 | 0 | 0% |
Manicaland | 16 | 8 | 51% | 4 | 2 | 51% |
Harare | 19 | 10 | 53% | 5 | 1 | 21% |
Mashonaland West | 13 | 8 | 60% | 3 | 3 | 90% |
Masvingo | 13 | 9 | 69% | 3 | 7 | 215% |