Skip to main content

Table 1 HIV Screening and Testing by Selected Institutional and Respondent Characteristics, Transylvania and Moldavia Clinical Provider Assessment, 2017

From: Attitudes, practices, and priority of HIV screening and testing among clinical providers in Transylvania and Moldavia, Romania

 TotalNo, Do Not Offer HIV Screening/ TestingYes, Offer HIV Screening/ TestingOdds Ratio 
Characteristicn (%)n (%)n (%)OR (95% CI)p-value
Hospital-based93 (75.0)33 (35.5)60 (64.5)Referent0.027
Non-hospital based31 (25.0)18 (58.1)13 (41.9)2.5 (1.1, 5.8) 
Transylvania78 (62.9)18 (39.1)28 (60.9)Referent 
Moldavia46 (37.1)33 (42.3)45 (57.7)1.1 (0.5, 2.4)0.728
Urban117 (94.4)46 (39.3)71 (60.7)ReferentUrban
Rural7 (5.6)5 (71.4)2 (28.6)3.9 (0.7, 20.7)0.095
Physician Provider101 (81.5)41 (40.6)60 (59.4)Referent 
Non-physician Provider23 (18.5)10 (43.5)13 (56.5)1.1 (0.5, 2.1)0.800
Organization provides treatment for HIV patients60 (48.4)16 (25.0)48 (75.0)Referent 
Organization does not provide treatment for HIV patients64 (51.6)35 (58.3)25 (41.7)4.2 (2.0, 9.0)<.001
Organization has a written policy on testing for HIV103 (83.1)33 (32.0)70 (68.0)Referent 
Organization does not have a written policy on testing for HIV21 (16.9)18 (85.7)3 (14.3)12.7 (3.5, 46.3)<.001
Organization has a written policy on Post-Exposure Prophylaxis (PEP)72 (58.1)20 (27.8)52 (72.2)Referent 
Organization does not have a written policy on Post-Exposure Prophylaxis (PEP)52 (41.9)31 (59.6)21 (40.4)3.8 (1.8, 8.2)<.001