Skip to main content

Table 1 HIV Screening and Testing by Selected Institutional and Respondent Characteristics, Transylvania and Moldavia Clinical Provider Assessment, 2017

From: Attitudes, practices, and priority of HIV screening and testing among clinical providers in Transylvania and Moldavia, Romania

 

Total

No, Do Not Offer HIV Screening/ Testing

Yes, Offer HIV Screening/ Testing

Odds Ratio

 

Characteristic

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

OR (95% CI)

p-value

Hospital-based

93 (75.0)

33 (35.5)

60 (64.5)

Referent

0.027

Non-hospital based

31 (25.0)

18 (58.1)

13 (41.9)

2.5 (1.1, 5.8)

 

Transylvania

78 (62.9)

18 (39.1)

28 (60.9)

Referent

 

Moldavia

46 (37.1)

33 (42.3)

45 (57.7)

1.1 (0.5, 2.4)

0.728

Urban

117 (94.4)

46 (39.3)

71 (60.7)

Referent

Urban

Rural

7 (5.6)

5 (71.4)

2 (28.6)

3.9 (0.7, 20.7)

0.095

Physician Provider

101 (81.5)

41 (40.6)

60 (59.4)

Referent

 

Non-physician Provider

23 (18.5)

10 (43.5)

13 (56.5)

1.1 (0.5, 2.1)

0.800

Organization provides treatment for HIV patients

60 (48.4)

16 (25.0)

48 (75.0)

Referent

 

Organization does not provide treatment for HIV patients

64 (51.6)

35 (58.3)

25 (41.7)

4.2 (2.0, 9.0)

<.001

Organization has a written policy on testing for HIV

103 (83.1)

33 (32.0)

70 (68.0)

Referent

 

Organization does not have a written policy on testing for HIV

21 (16.9)

18 (85.7)

3 (14.3)

12.7 (3.5, 46.3)

<.001

Organization has a written policy on Post-Exposure Prophylaxis (PEP)

72 (58.1)

20 (27.8)

52 (72.2)

Referent

 

Organization does not have a written policy on Post-Exposure Prophylaxis (PEP)

52 (41.9)

31 (59.6)

21 (40.4)

3.8 (1.8, 8.2)

<.001