Skip to main content

Table 3 Barriers and facilitators to participation in and delivery of RESPOND, mapped to the COM-B Framework

From: A mixed methods process evaluation of a person-centred falls prevention program

  

Participant Behaviour = participation in RESPOND

Theme

Clinician Behaviour = delivery of RESPOND

Theme

Capability: physical and psychological capacity to engage in the behaviour

Barrier

• Complex health situationCR

• Lack of prior knowledge or training for delivery of specific RESPOND componentsI

Facilitator

• Increased awareness of falls risk factors and their management strategiesFG

• Medical clearance to commence exercise programCR

• Prior work experience or training in certain aspects of RESPONDI

Opportunity: external factors that make the behaviour possible

Barrier

• Complex social situationsCR

• Insufficient timeCR

• RESPOND recommendations not supported by participant’s primary healthcare providerCR, FG

• Participants’ competing priorities (health and social)I

• Participants’ lack of perceived relevanceI

Facilitator

• Access to transportCR

• Adequate timeCR

• Financially viableCR

• Services readily availableCR

• Supportive primary healthcare providerFG

• RESPOND education pamphlets as basis for intervention sessionsI

• Participants’ perceived relevanceI

Motivation: brain processes that direct behaviour, such as decision-making, habitual processes and emotional responses

Barrier

• Lack of perceived relevanceCR, FG

• Clinical decision-making within the constraints of the RCTI

Facilitator

• Support from RESPOND clinicianCR, FG

• Perceived personal relevanceCR, FG

• Positively-framed health messagesFG

• Participatory decision-makingFG

• Peer supportI

• Person-centred approachI

• Rapport with participantI

• Positively-framed health messagesI

  1. Data source: CR Clinician records, FG Focus group (participants), I Interview (clinicians). This table is based on the COM-B framework [34]