From: A mixed methods process evaluation of a person-centred falls prevention program
 |  | Participant Behaviour = participation in RESPOND Theme | Clinician Behaviour = delivery of RESPOND Theme |
---|---|---|---|
Capability: physical and psychological capacity to engage in the behaviour | Barrier | • Complex health situationCR | • Lack of prior knowledge or training for delivery of specific RESPOND componentsI |
Facilitator | • Increased awareness of falls risk factors and their management strategiesFG • Medical clearance to commence exercise programCR | • Prior work experience or training in certain aspects of RESPONDI | |
Opportunity: external factors that make the behaviour possible | Barrier | • Complex social situationsCR • Insufficient timeCR • RESPOND recommendations not supported by participant’s primary healthcare providerCR, FG | • Participants’ competing priorities (health and social)I • Participants’ lack of perceived relevanceI |
Facilitator | • Access to transportCR • Adequate timeCR • Financially viableCR • Services readily availableCR • Supportive primary healthcare providerFG | • RESPOND education pamphlets as basis for intervention sessionsI • Participants’ perceived relevanceI | |
Motivation: brain processes that direct behaviour, such as decision-making, habitual processes and emotional responses | Barrier | • Lack of perceived relevanceCR, FG | • Clinical decision-making within the constraints of the RCTI |
Facilitator | • Support from RESPOND clinicianCR, FG • Perceived personal relevanceCR, FG • Positively-framed health messagesFG • Participatory decision-makingFG | • Peer supportI • Person-centred approachI • Rapport with participantI • Positively-framed health messagesI |