Skip to main content

Table 2 Response of graduate heath care students to each questions that assess their knowledge about PEP in UOGCSH, 2015, N = 220

From: Knowledge, attitude and practices of medical and health science students on the antiretroviral based HIV post-exposure prophylaxis in an Ethiopian hospital: an institutional based cross-sectional study

Knowledge questions

Responses

Frequency (%)

Heard about PEP

Yes

215 (97.7)

No

5 (2.3)

Know the use of PEP

Yes

208 (94.5)

No

12 (5.5)

PEP reduces likelihood of HIV

Yes

202 (91.8)

No

18 (8.2)

PEP prolongs life of person

Yes

17 (7.7)

No

203 (92.3)

High risk of blood fluid

Correct

20 (9.1)

Incorrect

200 (90.9)

Effectiveness of PEP

Correct

95 (43.2)

Incorrect

125 (56.8)

Lack of Protective barriers is a perceived cause of HIV

Yes

139 (63.2)

No

81 (36.8)

Work load is a perceived cause of HIV

Yes

80 (36.4)

No

140 (63.6)

Lack of standard precautions is perceived cause of HIV

Yes

92 (41.8)

No

128 (58.2)

PEP given in hospital

Yes

198 (90.0)

No

22 (10.0)

Best time to start PEP (72 h)

Correct

166 (75.5)

Incorrect

54 (24.5)

Consider PEP after cleaning the wound

Yes

176 (80)

No

44 (20)

Attended training related PEP

Yes

90 (40.9)

No

130 (59.1)

When did you received training

Before 1 year

64 (29.0)

In past 1–2 years

18 (8.2)

Before 3 years

6 (2.7)

Information about available PEP guidelines

Yes

90 (40.9)

No

130 (59.1)

Mentioned at least two drugs given for PEP

Yes

76 (34.5)

No

144 (65.5)

Source of PEP information

Classroom lectures

111 (50.5)

Training

66 (30.0)

Personal study

31 (14.1)

Seminar

8 (3.6)