Skip to main content

Table 5 Program characteristics* associated with being provided with a coordinator

From: Horizontal return to work coordination was more common in RTW programs than the recommended vertical coordination. The Rapid-RTW cohort study

 

Unadjusted results

Adjusted results

Variable

OR

95% CI

p-value

OR

95%CI

p-value

Age

0.97

0.96–0.99

<0.01*

0.97

0.95–0.99

0.01*

Gender

 Women

1.20

0.79–1.82

0.40

   

 Men (ref)

      

Type of program

 Occupational rehabilitation

5.05

3.31–7.71

<0.01*

3.87

2.41–6.24

<0.01*

 Follow-up and Work clarification programs (NAV)

6.58

2.62–16.55

<0.01*

4.77

1.83–12.44

<0.01*

 Treatment incl. Assessment and surgery (ref)

  

<0.01*

  

<0.01*

Professionals involved

 Medical doctor

2.27

1.25–4.11

<0.01*

1.81

0.84–3.89

0.13

 Vocational consultant

2.09

1.27–3.45

<0.01*

1.61

0.78–3.34

0.20

 Nutritionist

1.95

1.19–3.19

<0.01*

1.52

0.79–2.93

0.21

 Physical therapist

4.98

2.78–8.93

<0.01*

4.75

1.82–12.41

<0.01*

 Occupational therapist

1.79

1.00–3.18

0.05*

2.58

1.21–5.50

0.02*

 Psychologist

0.65

0.40–1.04

0.07

   

 Pedagogue

3.58

1.78–7.21

<0.01*

2.02

0.85–4.81

0.11

Adaptations

 No adaptations

0.09

0.20–0.36

<0.01*

0.08

0.01–0.60

0.01*

Contact with other instances

 Leader/supervisor

2.67

1.03–6.88

0.04*

1.69

0.31–9.27

0.54

  1. Notes: Statistical significance set at level =/< 0.05. *p-level < 0.2 in association testing, see Table 4. **Controlled for age, gender, diagnosis, sickness absence days before RTW-program, and type of program