Skip to main content

Table 5 Regional Variation of Program Implementation by Implementation Domain

From: Implementation of a group-based diabetes prevention program within a healthcare delivery system

Domain

Consistent across all regions

Variable across regions

Adoption

• Promoted as a weight management program

• Exclusively offered in English

• Branded name

• Number of sites offering the program

• Frequency of program offerings

Penetration

• Physician referrals as a recruitment method

• Visibility of program to patients

• Consistency of physician referrals

Acceptabilitya

+ Evidence base of program

+ Easy-to-follow curriculum

− Focus on calories and fat counting

− Visual appeal of materials

• Program’s focus on behavior change

• Group-based nature of program

• Quality and level of physical activity and nutrition information in curriculum

Appropriateness

• No consistencies in views of appropriateness

• Suitability of curriculum’s educational level

• Relevance of program material example stories and problems

• Compatibility of program’s goal-setting guidelines

Feasibility

• Difficulties with recruitment and retention

• Patient attrition as a reason for discontinuation at site

• Site also discontinued program due to other reasons (e.g. LC availability)

Fidelity

• Intensive core phase

• Self-monitoring of food choices and weight

• Content of post-core maintenance

• Type of training LC received

• Eligibility criteria of participants

• Variation in program structure (see Table 4 for details)

• Supplementation of core curriculum with additional information for specific patient groups

Program Cost

• No consistencies in cost of program

• Cost of the program for participants

• Insurance coverage

• Perceived program affordability

Sustainability

• Patient attrition as a challenge

• Specific strategies to increase recruitment and stakeholder’s buy-in

• Specific strategies to increase retention

  1. a + denotes acceptable; − denotes unacceptable