Table 5 Relationship between patient ratings and ITC characteristics
Type of outcome variable | Mean score | Promoter (> = 9) | Ratings > = 7 | Ratings > = 8 | Detractor (<=6) | NPS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Type of model | RE-Linear | RE-Logit | RE-Logit | RE-Logit | RE-Logit | RE-Linear |
Log invasive treatments | −0.073* (0.035) | −0.123* (0.071) | −0.103 (0.121) | −0.174* (0.099) | 0.182 (0.151) | 0.027 (0.025) |
FTE number of professionals | 0.002 (0.003) | 0.007 (0.006) | 0.008 (0.012) | 0.014 (0.009) | −0.013 (0.016) | −0.00 (0.002) |
No chain membership | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference |
Chain membership | −0.163* (0.089) | −0.133 (0.184) | − 0.409* (0.238) | −0.390* (0.212) | 0.504* (0.293) | −0.077* (0.047) |
For-profit | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference |
Non-profit | −0.133 (0.114) | −0.365 (0.233) | − 0.355 (0.361) | −0.446 (0.288) | 0.037 (0.429) | −0.178*** (0.061) |
Level of measurement | Patient level | Patient level | Patient level | Patient level | Patient level | Provider level |
Cluster | ID ITC + ID Chain | ID ITC + ID Chain | ID ITC + ID Chain | ID ITC + ID Chain | ID ITC + ID Chain | ID Chain |
Observations | 16,507 | 16,507 | 16,507 | 16,507 | 16,507 | 97 |
Number of groups | 68 | 68 | 68 | 68 | 68 | 46 |