Skip to main content

Table 4 Relationship between the composite structural and process quality indicators or postoperative infections and ITC characteristics

From: Is there a volume-quality relationship within the independent treatment centre sector? A longitudinal analysis

 

Model I

Model II

Model III

Model IV

Type of outcome variable

Composite structural and process quality indicator

Percentage postoperative infections

Percentage postoperative infections

Percentage postoperative infections

Type of model used

RE-Linear

RE-Linear

RE-Linear

RE-Linear

Type of data used

Annual data

Annual data

Total over 3 years

Annual data

Log invasive treatments

0.418*** (0.089)

−0.339*** (0.033)

−0.094*** (0.031)

 

Highest quantile invasive treatments

   

Reference

Higher medium quantile invasive treatments

   

0.029 (0.096)

Lower medium quantile invasive treatments

   

0.169 (0.107)

Lowest quantile invasive treatments

   

0.293*** (0.114)

FTE number of professionals

0.009 (0.034)

0.010 (0.006)

0.011* (0.006)

0.009 (0.009)

No chain membership

Reference

Reference

Reference

Reference

Chain membership

−0.393 (0.302)

0.116* (0.063)

− 0.130 (0.090)

− 0.100 (0.074)

For-profit

Reference

Reference

Reference

Reference

Non-profit

0.449 (0.363)

0.028 (0.073)

0.174** (0.075)

0.187** (0.087)

Cluster/Identifier

ID ITC

ID ITC

ID Chain

ID ITC

Observations

459

292

112

596

Number of groups

211

145

72

236

  1. Corrected for type of specialism, case-mix (i.e. ASA II & III) and year effects (except for the pooled data)
  2. ***p < 0.01, **p < 0.05, *p < 0.1