Skip to main content

Table 6 Linear mixed model analyses (TTR calculation based on GP-based target ranges)a – practice-level covariates

From: Differences in the quality of oral anticoagulation therapy with vitamin K antagonists in German GP practices – results of the cluster-randomized PICANT trial (Primary Care Management for Optimized Antithrombotic Treatment)

Variables

Regression coefficient

95% confidence interval

P valueb

R 2

Male gender

−3.51

−7.54; 0.52

0.086

0.09

Age of GP, years

0.07

− 0.20; 0.34

0.621

0.09

Job experience since medical school, years

0.08

−0.18; 0.33

0.551

0.09

Practice type

 Single-handed practice

Reference

 Shared or group practice

−1.08

−5.06; 2.90

0.588

0.09

Panel size, registered patients per quarter, no. (%)c

0.598

0.10

 500–999

Reference

 1009–1499

−2.72

−8.87; 3.43

  

 1500–1999

−4.83

−11.37; 1.71

  

  > 2000

− 4.19

−11.13; 2.76

  

Main focus of the practiced

 Cardiology

−0.41

−4.36; 3.54

0.836

0.09

 Diabetology

−0.06

−4.01; 3.89

0.977

0.09

 Geriatrics

−0.33

−4.61; 3.95

0.878

0.09

 Natural medicine

−4.26

−9.93; 1.40

0.137

0.09

Third-party certification in quality management for medical practices (e.g. QEP)e

−5.74

−9.47; − 2.01

0.003

0.10

Knowledge test on OAC for GPs, pointsf

0.00

−1.27; 1.28

0.996

0.09

Location of the practice

 Rural (<  20.000 inhabitants)

Reference

 Provincial (20.000–100.000 inhabitants)

−4.14

−8.55; 0.27

0.266

0.10

 Urban (>  100.000 inhabitants)

−0.97

−5.96; 4.02

  
  1. aThese analyses are based on n = 688 patients and the models are adjusted for randomization group
  2. bp values marked in bold are statistically significant at a significance level of 0.05
  3. cIn Germany, panel size is calculated as the number of patient registrations in a practice over a 3-month period
  4. dPractices may have had more than one focus
  5. eThe quality management system QEP (Qualität und Entwicklung in Praxen® [Quality and Development in practices]) was developed by the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians and regional Associations of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians
  6. fSelf-developed knowledge questionnaire (sum score 0–12) with higher scores indicating greater knowledge about OAC