Skip to main content

Table 1 Key informant-identified barriers and facilitators to the implementation and adoption of the cancer prevention CDS by CFIR domain and construct (n = 28)

From: Barriers and facilitators to implementing cancer prevention clinical decision support in primary care: a qualitative study

CFIR Domains & Constructs

Barriers

Count

Facilitators

Count

I. Intervention Characteristics

 B. Evidence Strength and Quality

Concern about inaccuracy or conflicting CDS recommendations compared to healthcare system recommendationsa

9

CDS follows USPSTF recommendations

3

 C. Relative Advantage

  

CDS improvement over current EHR alerts and tools

18

  

Potential for time savings

7

  

CDS similar to current EHR alerts and tools

5

 D. Adaptability

  

Optimize CDS integration into clinic workflow

22

 G. Design Quality and Packaging

CDS duplicates or complicates care

11

  

II. Outer Setting

 A. Patient Needs and Resources

Financial costs to patients

11

Patient self-educationa

10

Patient socioeconomic disparities

5

Patients controlling own healtha

9

Patient transportation issues

4

Organization increasing PCP patient visits from 18 to 22 a daya

8

  

Reminders to patientsa

5

  

Repeated exposure for patientsa

5

  

Focus on prevention over crisis or acutea

5

  

Lung cancer screeninga

3

 D. External Policy and Incentives

  

Positive impact on quality metricsa

11

III. Inner Setting

 C. Culture

  

Alignment with institutional aimsa

16

 D. Implementation Climate

  1. Tension for change

PCP time limitationsa

25

PCP time limitations are manageable

5

Alert fatigue (PCPs and/or patients)

25

  

  2. Compatibility

Not appropriate for acute visits – annual only

9

CDS appropriate for many visit types

5

Not everything in the EHR is accurate or easy to find

9

Others than PCPs using CDS:

22

RN CDS use issues (e.g., not appropriate for all RN visit types, RN roles can vary by clinic, RN shortage in healthcare system)a

5

 RNs using CDS in general

22

  

 RNs using CDS during Medicare annual Wellness visits

14

  

 RNs using CDS alongside other PCPs

4

  

 Clinic rooming staff using CDS

4

  

Get CDS printouts to patients before provider (e.g., pre-visit use, before PCP enters room)

18

  

Alignment with institutional aimsa

16

  

Institution-wide streamlining of EHR alerts

9

  

Team model of care

8

  3. Relative Priority

Seen as just another initiative

10

  

Organization increasing PCP patient visits from 18 to 22 a daya

8

  

Lack of institutional initiative prioritization

3

  

  4. Organizational Incentives and Rewards

  

Positive impact on quality metricsa

11

 E. Readiness for Implementation

  2. Available Resources

PCP time limitationsa

25

  

Not all clinics have color printers - looks better in color

6

  

RN CDS use issues (e.g., not appropriate for all RN visit types, RN roles can vary by clinic, RN shortage in healthcare system)a

5

  

PCP shortage/burnout

4

  

Too few printers

3

  

Clinic rooming staff – already crunched for time

2

  

  3. Access to Knowledge and Information

Does not recall receiving cardiovascular CDS training

8

Providing in-person training on the CDS

16

E-learning not always effective

6

E-learning or webinars are acceptable

6

  

Provide PCPs with supporting CDS evidence

6

  

Focus on workflow in training

5

  

Provide multiple learning points

4

IV. Characteristics of Individuals

 A. Knowledge and Beliefs about the Intervention

Concern about inaccuracy or conflicting CDS recommendations compared to healthcare system recommendationsa

9

Patient self-educationa

10

PCP distrust of HPV vaccine or cancer risk calculators

3

Patients controlling own healtha

9

  

Reminders to patientsa

5

  

Repeated exposure for patientsa

5

  

Focus on prevention over crisis or acutea

5

  

Lung cancer screeninga

3

  1. CFIR - Damschroder et al. [19]. Sample size (n) refers to number of informants interviewed. Count refers to the number of informants that mentioned a specific barrier or facilitator
  2. aCode fit with two CFIR constructs. Could also be a barrier for one construct and a facilitator for another