Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of results of salt reformulation intervention

From: Estimating the cost-effectiveness of salt reformulation and increasing access to leisure centres in England, with PRIMEtime CE model validation using the AdViSHE tool

 

Males (95% CI)

Females (95% CI)

Total (mean; 95% CIs)

Cost per QALY – overall (£)*

–

–

Dominant

Return on investment (£ for £1 spent)*

–

–

1.44 (1.47; 0.50 to 2.94)

Change in QALYs

9045 (3629 to 15,338)

5945 (2320 to 10,186)

15,000 (15,275; 5929 to 25,519)

NHS savings (£)

95,623,517 (39,784,418 to 159,346,380)

45,721,114 (18,519,937 to 76,690,196)

141,701,342 (141,921,578; 58,825,774 to 235,925,461)

Social care savings (£)

350,748,015 (148,153,324 to 582,543,734)

371,065,063 (154,269,323 to 619,047,856)

724,832,212 (730,558,705; 306,525,399 to 1200,201,282)

Intervention costs (£)*

598,039,731 (489,209,385 to 717,730,482)

598,039,731 (489,209,385 to 717,730,482)

598,039,731 (599,844,427; 489,209,385 to 717,730,482)

  1. *The intervention and its costs affect the entire population and cannot be targeted such that only one subgroup is affected. Therefore, cost per QALY results are not reported by sex. Results presented are the median values from 2000 iterations of a Monte Carlo simulation, as such, the numbers in the final column may not equal the sum of males and females; 95% uncertainty intervals in parentheses; QALY, quality adjusted life year
Back to article page

BMC Health Services Research

ISSN: 1472-6963

Contact us