Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary table of the inputs, outputs and area-specific meta-predictors

From: Assessing frontline HIV service provider efficiency using data envelopment analysis: a case study of Philippine social hygiene clinics (SHCs)

SHC aInput bOutput
Gram stain Condom HIV test Sub-total Sub-rank Gram Stain Condom Sub-total Sub-rank
MSM
 Baguio 20 5 250 275 8 87 75 162 3
 Cagayan de Oro 16 3 122 141 5 39 55 94 7
 Cebu 18 6.7 120 144.7 6 45 81 126 5
 Davao 19.8 3 60 82.8 2 96 177 273 2
 Makati 4 1.28 44.2 49.48 1 21 36 57 8
 Pasay 27.6 13.6 96 137.2 4 42 84 126 5
 Quezon City 11.6 11.5 80 103.1 3 40 113 153 4
 Zamboanga 25 3 120 148 7 96 222 318 1
 Sub-Total 142 47.08 892.2 1081.28   466 843 1309  
 Percentage (%) 13 4 83 100   36 64 100  
 Mean 17.8 5.89 112 135.2   58.3 105 163.6  
 Standard deviation 7.45 4.45 63.1 66.5   29.8 63.4 88.6  
FFSW
 Baguio 20 5 250 275 8 123 45 168 6
 Cagayan de Oro 16 3 122 141 5 254 152 406 2
 Cebu 18 6.7 120 144.7 6 212 187 399 3
 Davao 19.8 3 60 82.8 2 204 195 399 3
 Makati 3.84 8.46 64.8 77.1 1 40 43 83 7
 Pasay 27.6 13.6 96 137.2 4 42 21 63 8
 Quezon City 11.6 11.5 80 103.1 3 132 215 347 5
 Zamboanga 20.4 3 144 167.4 7 233 236 469 1
 Sub-Total 137.24 54.26 936.8 1128.3   1240 1094 2334  
 Percentage (%) 12 5 83 100   53 47 100  
 Mean 17.2 6.78 117 141   155 137 291.8  
 Standard deviation 7.02 4.10 61.2 124.3   83.7 86.8 307.2  
RFSW
 Baguio 20 5 250 275 7 300 270 570 4
 Cagayan de Oro 16 3 122 141 4 298 259 557 5
 Cebu 18 6.7 120 144.7 5 297 240 537 6
 Davao 19.8 3 60 82.8 1 297 276 573 3
 Makati 3.84 5.83 321 330.67 8 303 272 575 1
 Pasay 27.6 13.6 96 137.2 3 245 266 511 8
 Quezon City 11.6 11.5 80 103.1 2 261 264 525 7
 Zamboanga 12.8 3 159 174.8 6 296 278 574 2
 Sub-Total 129.64 51.63 1208 1389.27   2297 2125 4422  
 Percentage (%) 9 4 87 100   52 48 100  
 Mean 16.2 6.45 151 174   287 266 553  
 Standard deviation 7.03 4.05 90.2 85.7   21.6 12.1 25.2  
AGGREGATE
 Baguio 60 15 750 825 8 510 390 900 6
 Cagayan de Oro 48 9 366 423 4 591 466 1057 4
 Cebu 54 20.1 360 434.1 5 554 508 1062 3
 Davao 59.4 9 180 248.4 1 597 648 1245 2
 Makati 11.7 15.6 430 457.3 6 364 351 715 7
 Pasay 82.8 40.8 288 411.6 3 329 371 700 8
 Quezon City 34.9 34.5 240 309.4 2 433 592 1025 5
 Zamboanga 58.2 9 423 490.2 7 625 736 1361 1
 Sub-Total 409 153 3037 3599   4003 4062 8065  
 Percentage (%) 11 4 84 100   50 50 100  
 Mean 51.1 19.1 380 450   500 508 1008  
 Standard deviation 20.8 12.2 173 171   112 140 233  
SHC Area-specific meta-predictors
cIncome
(Php)
dAMTP 5
Classification
Baguio 1146 B
Cagayan de Oro 618 B
Cebu 6653 A
Davao 5064 A
Makati 10,006 A
Pasay 2961 A
Quezon City 11,589 A
Zamboanga 2192 B
Mean 5029  
Standard deviation 4094  
  1. anumber of people accessing the service
  2. bUnit cost in Philippine Peso (Php)
  3. c2012 Income (by Php 1,000,000)
  4. dAMTP 5 categories are based on how big the Percentage of the epidemic a specific area contributes
  5. Manila was excluded in the aggregate, since it has no input/output parameters for the RFSW population