Cost-effectiveness of a community-based cardiovascular disease prevention intervention in medically underserved rural areas

Table 7 By site - Cost-effectiveness of SHHC. ICERs (vs Status Quo) from the payer or healthcare sector perspective

Site ID	Weight loss	BMI reduction	CRP reduction	Simple 7 increase	ASCVD QALY saved
3	284	759	*93,477	3495	136,276
5	156	394	442	675	455,779
6	*830	*2502	482	1341	58,924
8	343	954	921	921	186,004
11	157	625	341	1811	−16,991
12	793	1920	420	370	396,841
14	321	829	471	439	− 9480
16	290	741	572	859	*1,386,823

ICERs for QALY saved are estimated from the healthcare perspective and ICERs for other outcomes are from the payer perspective. The negative ICERs represent cost savings. The “*” implies that the effect is in the unexpected direction. For example, an ICER for weight loss with “*” implies that on average participants gained instead of lost body weight after the SHHC

ISSN: 1472-6963