Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of respondents who sought a second opinion in the public system vs. the private system (n = 339)

From: Reasons, perceived outcomes and characteristics of second-opinion seekers: are there differences in private vs. public settings?

Characteristics

Public system n = 125 (%)

Private system n = 214 (%)

p-value

Gender

0.892

 Male

50 (37.3%)

84 (62.7%)

 

 Female

75 (36.6%)

130 (63.4%)

 

Age group

0.29

 18–39

41 (42.3%)

56 (57.7%)

 

 40–59

38 (31.9%)

81 (68.1%)

 

 60+

46 (37.4%)

77 (62.6%)

 

Educational level

0.296

 Basic

20 (47.6%)

22 (52.4%)

 

 High school

56 (36.4%)

98 (63.6%)

 

 Academic

49 (34.5%)

93 (65.5%)

 

 Missing values

 

1

 

Personal status

0.43

 Living with a partner

95 (35.4%)

173 (64.6%)

 

 Not Living with a partner

28 (40.6%)

41 (59.4%)

 

 Missing values

2

  

Ethnicity

0.237

 Jewish

98 (34.9%)

183 (65.1%)

 

 Arabic

23 (43.4%)

30 (56.6%)

 

 Missing values

4

1

 

Religiosity

.015*

 Religious

51 (45.1%)

62 (54.9%)

 

 Secular

70 (31.7%)

151 (68.3%)

 

 Missing values

4

1

 

Self-reported income group

.027*

 Well below the average

40 (48.2%)

43 (51.8%)

 

 Around the average

57 (31.5%)

124 (68.5%)

 

 Well above the average

8 (30.8%)

18 (69.2%)

 

 Missing values

20

29

 

Socioeconomic level (by residential area)

.015*

 Low

33 (49.3%)

34 (50.7%)

 

 Middle and higha

86 (33.2%)

173 (66.8%)

 

 Missing values

6

7

 

Immigration

.006*

 Native-born and established immigrants

106 (34.5%)

201 (65.5%)

 

 Immigrants (immigrated to Israel after 1989)

19 (59.4%)

13 (40.6%)

 

Country of birth

0.741

 Israeli

78 (36.1%)

138 (63.9%)

 

 European / American

14 (37.8%)

23 (62.2%)

 

 Soviet Union

13 (44.8%)

16 (55.2%)

 

 Asian / African

18 (32.7%)

37 (67.3%)

 

 Missing values

2

  

Perceived Health status

0.68

 Very good

49 (38.9%)

77 (61.1%)

 

 Good

44 (34.1%)

85 (65.9%)

 

 Not so good

27 (34.2%)

52 (65.8%)

 

Missing values

5

  
  1. p < 0.05
  2. Note: Percentages are calculated as valid % per each row (i.e., each row sums up to 100%, without Missing values)
  3. aHigh socio-economic level was combined with middle socio-economic level because of small numbers at this level.