Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Subscribers’ perception of quality of services provided by Ghana’s National Health Insurance Scheme - what are the correlates?

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
6 Aug 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
21 Sep 2018 Author responded Author comments - Edward Nketiah-Amponsah
Resubmission - Version 2
21 Sep 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
9 Oct 2018 Author responded Author comments - Edward Nketiah-Amponsah
Resubmission - Version 3
9 Oct 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
27 Oct 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nel Jason Haw
31 Oct 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ama Fenny
6 Nov 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nele Van der Wielen
8 Dec 2018 Author responded Author comments - Edward Nketiah-Amponsah
Resubmission - Version 4
8 Dec 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
19 Dec 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nele Van der Wielen
11 Jan 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nel Jason Haw
13 Feb 2019 Author responded Author comments - Edward Nketiah-Amponsah
Resubmission - Version 5
13 Feb 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 5
7 Mar 2019 Author responded Author comments - Edward Nketiah-Amponsah
Resubmission - Version 6
7 Mar 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
18 Mar 2019 Editorially accepted
28 Mar 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12913-019-4023-3

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement