“My gut feeling is we could do more...” a qualitative study exploring staff and patient perspectives before and after the implementation of an online prostate cancer-specific holistic needs assessment
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|1 Oct 2018||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|4 Dec 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Constantina Papadopoulou|
|18 Dec 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Melanie Charalambous|
|21 Dec 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Amy Clarke|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|21 Dec 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|10 Jan 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Constantina Papadopoulou|
|23 Jan 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Melanie Charalambous|
|25 Jan 2019||Author responded||Author comments - Amy Clarke|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|25 Jan 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|29 Jan 2019||Author responded||Author comments - Amy Clarke|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|29 Jan 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|31 Jan 2019||Editorially accepted|
|12 Feb 2019||Article published||10.1186/s12913-019-3941-4|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.