Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: “My gut feeling is we could do more...” a qualitative study exploring staff and patient perspectives before and after the implementation of an online prostate cancer-specific holistic needs assessment

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
1 Oct 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
4 Dec 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Constantina Papadopoulou
18 Dec 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Melanie Charalambous
21 Dec 2018 Author responded Author comments - Amy Clarke
Resubmission - Version 2
21 Dec 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
10 Jan 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Constantina Papadopoulou
23 Jan 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Melanie Charalambous
25 Jan 2019 Author responded Author comments - Amy Clarke
Resubmission - Version 3
25 Jan 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 3
29 Jan 2019 Author responded Author comments - Amy Clarke
Resubmission - Version 4
29 Jan 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
31 Jan 2019 Editorially accepted
12 Feb 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12913-019-3941-4

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement