Open Peer Review Reports for: Concordance between self-report and medical records of preventive healthcare delivery among a sample of disadvantaged patients from four aboriginal community controlled health services
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 16 Oct 2018 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 6 Nov 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Trisasi Lestari |
| 15 Nov 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nicole Blay |
| 11 Jan 2019 | Author responded | Author comments - Natasha Noble |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 11 Jan 2019 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 23 Jan 2019 | Author responded | Author comments - Natasha Noble |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 23 Jan 2019 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| Publishing | ||
| 28 Jan 2019 | Editorially accepted | |
| 8 Feb 2019 | Article published | 10.1186/s12913-019-3930-7 |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.
