Skip to main content

Table 3 Factors on the organizational level (n = 18) affecting mean first user ratio

From: Pace and determinants of implementation of the self-management of well-being group intervention: a multilevel observational study

  

n

Mean % of users per organization

p-value

Factors related to characteristics organization

Size

 Size organization

  1 = large (>  150 employees)

8

.97

.018*

  0 = small (<  150 employees)

10

.52

 

 Size unit

  1 = large (>  10 Ftu)

8

.72

.750

  0 = small (<  10 Ftu)

8

.65

 

Structure

 Functional structure

  1 = task oriented

11

.72

.814

  0 = output oriented

6

.67

 

 Setting

  1 = social work

15

.68

.384

  0 = health

3

.92

 

Staff turn-over

 1 = low

3

.83

.616

 0 = high

15

.69

 

Staff capacity

 1 = sufficient

6

.62

.523

 0 = insufficient

12

.76

 

Innovation task-orientation fit

 1 = fit between innovation and needs older adults

16

.75

.453

 0 = no fit between innovation and needs older adults

2

.50

 

 1 = fit between innovation and view management

15

.79

.008*

 0 = no fit between innovation and view management

2

.00

 

Expectations cooperation target group

 1 = positive

1

1

.544

 0 = not positive

16

.75

 

Expectations satisfaction target group

 1 = positive

13

.71

.376

 0 = not positive

2

1

 

Factors related to decision-making

Decision making process and procedures

 1 = both professionals and management participated

7

.89

.164

 0 = professionals or management decided (bottom-up or top-down)

11

.61

 

Hierarchical structure

   

 1 = short communication channels (low formalization)

15

.67

.211

 0 = long communication channels (high formalization)

3

1

 

Formal reinforcement

 1 = formal reinforcement (incorporated in annual report)

14

.78

.250

 0 = no formal reinforcement (not incorporated in annual report)

4

.50

 

Factors related to collaboration

Relationships with other organizations

 1 = outreaching

17

.76

 

 0 = introvert

0

0

 

Nature of collaboration internally

 1 = good collaboration

16

.68

.327

 0 = poor collaboration

2

1

 

Factors related to resources

Available expertise

 1 = much expertise

14

.64

.189

 0 = little expertise

3

1

 

Logistical procedures

 1 = well arranged

13

.75

.614

 0 = badly arranged

5

.63

 

Other (material) resources available

 1 = available

12

.65

.318

 0 = not available

6

.86

 

Administrative support available

 1 = available

11

.69

.804

 0 = not available

7

.75

 

Time available

 1 = time available

7

.71

.979

 0 = no time available

11

.72

 

Coordinator available

 1 = coordinator available

16

.75

.453

 0 = no coordinator available

2

.50

 

Factors related to motivators

Reimbursement

 1 = reimbursement

2

.87

.589

 0 = no reimbursement

16

.70

 

Opinion leader

 1 = available

11

.75

.695

 0 = not available

7

.67

 
  1. * p-values < .05 were significant
  2. FTU Functional Task Unit