Skip to main content

Table 2 Factors on the professional level affecting first use

From: Pace and determinants of implementation of the self-management of well-being group intervention: a multilevel observational study

 

Use (n = 30)

No use (n = 13)

p-value

 

n

(%)

n

(%)

Factors related to competencies professional

Skills

 1 = prior experience working with groups of older adults

26

(72.2)

10

(27.8)

.561

 0 = no prior experience working with groups of older adults

4

(66.7)

2

(33.3)

 

Knowledge

 1 = higher education

27

(71.1)

11

(28.9)

.482

 0 = vocational education

3

(60.0)

2

(40.0)

 

Self-efficacy

 1 = confidence in recruiting, organizing and supervising the group

17

(85.0)

3

(15.0)

.064

 0 = no confidence in recruiting, organizing and supervising the group

13

(59.1)

9

(40.9)

 

Factors related to the innovation

Ownership

 1 = feeling responsible for SMW group intervention implementation

25

(80.6)

6

(19.4)

.036*

 0 = not feeling responsible for SMW group intervention implementation

5

(45.5)

6

(54.5)

 

Clearness procedures

 1 = SMW manual is clear

30

(73.2)

11

(26.8)

.286

 0 = SMW manual is not clear

0

(0.0)

1

(100.0)

 

Relative advantage

 1 = advantage

21

(87.5)

3

(12.5)

.010*

 0 = no advantage

9

(50.0)

9

(50.0)

 

Appealing to use

 1 = appealing

22

(66.7)

11

(33.3)

.190

 0 = not appealing

8

(88.9)

1

(11.1)

 

Factors related to work situation

Support from SMW-colleagues

 1 = positive actions

27

(79.4)

7

(20.6)

.031*

 0 = no positive actions

3

(37.5)

5

(62.5)

 

 1 = positive cooperation (missing n = 11)

28

(93.3)

2

(6.7)

.877

 0 = no positive cooperation

2

(100.0)

0

(0.0)

 

Support from other colleagues

 1 = positive attitude

25

(75.8)

8

(24.2)

.216

 0 = no positive attitude

5

(55.6)

4

(44.4)

 

 1 = positive actions

15

(71.4)

6

(28.6)

.633

 0 = no positive actions

15

(71.4)

6

(28.6)

 

Support from supervisor

 1 = positive attitude

28

(75.7)

9

(24.3)

.131

 0 = no positive attitude

2

(40.0)

3

(60.0)

 

 1 = positive actions

17

(77.3)

5

(22.7)

.296

 0 = no positive actions

13

(65.0)

7

(35.0)

 

Support from higher management

 1 = positive attitude

23

(76.7)

7

(23.3)

.207

 0 = no positive attitude

7

(58.3)

5

(41.7)

 

 1 = positive actions (missing n = 9)

9

(75.0)

3

(25.0)

.351

 0 = no positive actions

19

(86.4)

3

(13.6)

 

Modelling

 1 = stimulated by implementation success of other organizations

18

(72.0)

7

(28.0)

.481

 0 = not stimulated by implementation success of other organizations

12

(66.7)

6

(33.3)

 

Factors related to work situation (continued)

Innovation task-orientation fit

 1 = fit between innovation and needs older adults

29

(72.5)

11

(27.5)

.231

 0 = no fit between innovation and needs older adults

1

(33.3)

2

(66.7)

 

 1 = fit between innovation and perceived task professional

24

(70.6)

10

(29.4)

.589

 0 = no fit between innovation and perceived task professional

6

(75.0)

2

(25.0)

 

Work related stress

 1 = no overtime work

15

(68.2)

7

(31.8)

.540

 0 = overtime work

15

(71.4)

6

(28.6)

 

 1 = no sick leave

23

(69.7)

10

(30.3)

.654

 0 = sick leave

7

(70.0)

3

(30.0)

 

 1 = satisfied with job

28

(71.8)

11

(28.2)

.350

 0 = not satisfied with job

2

(50.0)

2

(50.0)

 

 1 = no work pressure

2

(66.7)

1

(33.3)

.671

 0 = work pressure

28

(70.0)

12

(30.0)

 

Compatibility

 1 = compatible

14

(93.3)

1

(6.7)

.019*

 0 = not compatible

16

(59.3)

11

(40.7)

 
  1. * p -values < .05 were significant
  2. SMW  Self-management of Well-being