Table 4 List of Final Pragmatic Terms/Phrases
Dimension | Identified Through: | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Lit Review and Interviews | Lit Review Only | Interviews Only | |
Brief | ✓ | ||
connects to clinical outcomes | ✓ | ||
creates low assessor burden (ease of training, scoring, administration time) | ✓ | ||
easy to use | ✓ | ||
feasible | ✓ | ||
fits organizational activities | ✓ | ||
important to clinical care | ✓ | ||
informs clinical intervention selection | ✓ | ||
informs decision making | ✓ | ||
low burden | ✓ | ||
low cost | ✓ | ||
meaningful | ✓ | ||
not wordy | ✓ | ||
offers a compatible format to setting/user | ✓ | ||
produces reliable and valid results | ✓ | ||
reveals problems/issues in process or outcomes | ✓ | ||
sensitive to change | ✓ | ||
simple | ✓ | ||
the output of routine activities | ✓ | ||
acceptable (to staff and clients) | ✓ | ||
applicable | ✓ | ||
confirms efficacy of interventions | ✓ | ||
creates a low social desirability bias | ✓ | ||
easy to administer | ✓ | ||
easy to interpret | ✓ | ||
easy to score | ✓ | ||
efficient | ✓ | ||
focused | ✓ | ||
generates data that provides a positive feedback loop (not used for staff punishment) | ✓ | ||
has a meaningful score distribution | ✓ | ||
non-duplicative | ✓ | ||
of low complexity | ✓ | ||
offers flexible administration time | ✓ | ||
offers relative advantage over existing methods | ✓ | ||
optimizes patient care | ✓ | ||
provides a cut-off score leading to an intervention or treatment plan | ✓ | ||
relevant | ✓ | ||
accessible by phone | ✓ | ||
assesses organizational progress over time | ✓ | ||
completed with ease | ✓ | ||
informs adherence of fidelity | ✓ | ||
intuitive | ✓ | ||
offer automated scoring or can be scored elsewhere | ✓ | ||
requires no expertise | ✓ | ||
tied to reimbursement | ✓ | ||
transparent | ✓ | ||
uses accessible language | ✓ | ||